Evaluation of bone changes of the extraction sockets after immediate implant placement or socket preservation with or without surgical flap in the aesthetic zone : Randomized controlled clinical trial / Amr Mohamed Shaarawi ; Supervised Amr Fouad Zahran , Ahmed Reda

By:

Amr Mohamed Shaarawi

Contributor(s):

Material type: Text

TextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Amr Mohamed Shaarawi , 2021Description: 125 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:

"تقييم حجم التغير فى العظم واللثة بين زراعة الأسنان الفورية والحفاظ على المأخذ السنى فى المنطقة التجميلية برفع وعدم رفع اللثة : تجربة سريرية عشوائية [Added title page title]

Subject(s):

Online resources:

Click here to access online

Available additional physical forms:

Issued also as CD

Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Periodontology Summary: Aim: Evaluate the effect of immediate implant and socket preservation on bone volume with and without releasing flap. Research question: Does an immediate implant placement with xenogenic graft whether using flap or flapless will provide more alveolar bone preservation than delayed implant after socket preservation with xenogenic graft whether using flap or flapless in the upper esthetic region? Methodology: Thirty-two patients indicated for immediate implants or socket preservation were randomly allocated into 4 equal groups. Intervention group 1 (immediate implant placement with a xenogenic bone graft using the flapless technique) Intervention group 2 (immediate implant placement with the xenogenic bone graft after releasing flap) Intervention group 3 (alveolar socket preservation with a xenogenic bone graft using a flapless technique with delayed implant placement after 3 months) and control group alveolar socket preservation with xenogenic bone graft after releasing flap with delayed implant placement after 3 months). Bone volume was evaluated at baseline and after 6 months of implant placement using superimposition of CBCT, Implant stability was measured using periotest after abutment placement, Facial gingival level was assessed at baseline and after crown cementation Results: All implants were clinically successful. The results of the present study showed that socket preservation using xenograft yielded significantly less bone volume loss either with a flap or flapless tooth extraction than immediate implant placement with xenogenic bone graft either with a flap or flapless where the percentage of bone volume loss was 6.7% in flapless socket preservation with the delayed implant and 6.1% in socket preservation with flap and delayed implant and 11.2% in the immediate implant with flap and 10.7% in the flapless immediate implant. However, there is no significant difference between all groups in both Facial gingival level and Implant stability

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Home library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Thesis	قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول	المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة	Cai01.09.08.Ph.D.2021.Am.E (Browse shelf(Opens below))		Not for loan	01010110084815000
CD - Rom	مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم	المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة	Cai01.09.08.Ph.D.2021.Am.E (Browse shelf(Opens below))	84815.CD	Not for loan	01020110084815000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Periodontology

Aim: Evaluate the effect of immediate implant and socket preservation on bone volume with and without releasing flap. Research question: Does an immediate implant placement with xenogenic graft whether using flap or flapless will provide more alveolar bone preservation than delayed implant after socket preservation with xenogenic graft whether using flap or flapless in the upper esthetic region? Methodology: Thirty-two patients indicated for immediate implants or socket preservation were randomly allocated into 4 equal groups. Intervention group 1 (immediate implant placement with a xenogenic bone graft using the flapless technique) Intervention group 2 (immediate implant placement with the xenogenic bone graft after releasing flap) Intervention group 3 (alveolar socket preservation with a xenogenic bone graft using a flapless technique with delayed implant placement after 3 months) and control group alveolar socket preservation with xenogenic bone graft after releasing flap with delayed implant placement after 3 months). Bone volume was evaluated at baseline and after 6 months of implant placement using superimposition of CBCT, Implant stability was measured using periotest after abutment placement, Facial gingival level was assessed at baseline and after crown cementation Results: All implants were clinically successful. The results of the present study showed that socket preservation using xenograft yielded significantly less bone volume loss either with a flap or flapless tooth extraction than immediate implant placement with xenogenic bone graft either with a flap or flapless where the percentage of bone volume loss was 6.7% in flapless socket preservation with the delayed implant and 6.1% in socket preservation with flap and delayed implant and 11.2% in the immediate implant with flap and 10.7% in the flapless immediate implant. However, there is no significant difference between all groups in both Facial gingival level and Implant stability

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer