header
Image from OpenLibrary

Efficacy of shock wave and laser in treatment of planter fasciitis / by Marian William Farag ; Supervisors Prof.Dr. Soheir Shehata Rezkalla, Prof.Dr. Mary Nassif Takla, Dr.Ahmad Hamdi Azzam.

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Summary language: English, Arabic Producer: 2024Description: 130 pages : illustrations ; 25 cm. + CDContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • Unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
Other title:
  • فعالية الموجات التصادمية والليزر في علاج حالات التهاب صفاق الاخمص [Added title page title]
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 615.82
Available additional physical forms:
  • Issues also as CD.
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc)-Cairo University, 2024. Summary: Background: Plantar fasciitis (PF) is a common clinical painful degenerative disorder associated chronic inflammation that if inadequately treated could led to heel pain and foot dysfunction; it has a negative impact on individuals’ quality of life and work. Various therapeutic modalities such as shockwave therapy (ESWT) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) are used, but their efficacy is unclear Purpose: To assess the efficacy of shockwave and laser therapy for plantar fasciitis. Participants and Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 80 patients with chronic planter fasciitis, plus calcaneal spur, their ages range is 40-60 years old. They were randomly divided into four equal groups. Group A received ( ESWT and LLLT) , Group B received ESWT) , Group C received (LLLT) and all four groups received ice massage and streaching exercise all groups schedule was twice a week for three weeks. All participants were evaluated before and after the treatment sessions by visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess pain intensity, Windlass test to assess any abnormalities in planter fascia flexibility and foot functional index (FFI) for measure the impact of foot pathology on function in terms of pain, disability and activity restriction. Results: All groups showed significant reductions in pain and FFI scores (p<0.001). there was significant difference between all groups. Group A had the highest improvement, while Group D had the lowest. Group A also showed significant differences compared to Groups B, C, and D (p<0.001), but no differences were observed among Groups B, C, and D (p>0.05).there was significant difference in pain and FFI score between group A and B, A and C, A and D, B and C ,B and D. Significant changes in plantar fascia abnormalities were seen in Group A and Group B (p<0.01), but not in Group C and Group D (p>0.05). Conclusion: Shockwave unlike laser alone or in combination with stretching exercise and ice massage, were effective in reducing foot pain and improving foot function in plantar fasciitis patients. Shockwave showed the highest efficacy. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up is needed for confirmation. Summary: تم تقسيم 80 مريضًا عشوائيا إلى أربع مجاميع: تلقت المجموعة أ علاج الموجات التصادمية والليزر ، وتلقت المجموعة ب علاج الموجات التصادمية فقط، وتلقت المجموعة ج الليزر فقط، وكانت المجموعة د مجموعة الضابطه . تم تقييم الألم باستخدام مقياس المدى البصري، ووظيفة القدم باستخدام فهرس وظيفة القدم، وتم تقييم التغيرات في صفاق الاخمص باستخدام الأشعة السينية. علاج الموجات التصادمية على عكس علاج الليزر، سواء بمفردهما أو بالاشتراك مع ممارسة التمارين الاستطالة وتدليك الثلج،أظهر كلاهما فاعليه في تقليل ألم القدم وتحسين وظيفة القدم في مرضى التهاب صفاق الاخمص. علاج الموجات التصادمية أظهر أعلى فعالية. يُنصح بإجراء مزيد من البحوث بحجم عينات أكبر ومتابعة أطول للتأكد.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.09.M.Sc.2024.Ma.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110091066000

Thesis (M.Sc)-Cairo University, 2024.

Bibliography: pages 93-127.

Background: Plantar fasciitis (PF) is a common clinical painful degenerative disorder
associated chronic inflammation that if inadequately treated could led to heel pain and
foot dysfunction; it has a negative impact on individuals’ quality of life and work.
Various therapeutic modalities such as shockwave therapy (ESWT) and low-level laser
therapy (LLLT) are used, but their efficacy is unclear Purpose: To assess the efficacy
of shockwave and laser therapy for plantar fasciitis. Participants and Methods: A
randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 80 patients with chronic planter
fasciitis, plus calcaneal spur, their ages range is 40-60 years old. They were randomly
divided into four equal groups. Group A received ( ESWT and LLLT) , Group B
received ESWT) , Group C received (LLLT) and all four groups received ice massage
and streaching exercise all groups schedule was twice a week for three weeks. All
participants were evaluated before and after the treatment sessions by visual analogue
scale (VAS) to assess pain intensity, Windlass test to assess any abnormalities in planter
fascia flexibility and foot functional index (FFI) for measure the impact of foot
pathology on function in terms of pain, disability and activity restriction. Results: All
groups showed significant reductions in pain and FFI scores (p<0.001). there was
significant difference between all groups. Group A had the highest improvement, while
Group D had the lowest. Group A also showed significant differences compared to
Groups B, C, and D (p<0.001), but no differences were observed among Groups B, C,
and D (p>0.05).there was significant difference in pain and FFI score between group A
and B, A and C, A and D, B and C ,B and D. Significant changes in plantar fascia
abnormalities were seen in Group A and Group B (p<0.01), but not in Group C and
Group D (p>0.05). Conclusion: Shockwave unlike laser alone or in combination with
stretching exercise and ice massage, were effective in reducing foot pain and improving
foot function in plantar fasciitis patients. Shockwave showed the highest efficacy.
Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up is needed for
confirmation.

تم تقسيم 80 مريضًا عشوائيا إلى أربع مجاميع: تلقت المجموعة أ علاج الموجات التصادمية والليزر ، وتلقت المجموعة ب علاج الموجات التصادمية فقط، وتلقت المجموعة ج الليزر فقط، وكانت المجموعة د مجموعة الضابطه . تم تقييم الألم باستخدام مقياس المدى البصري، ووظيفة القدم باستخدام فهرس وظيفة القدم، وتم تقييم التغيرات في صفاق الاخمص باستخدام الأشعة السينية. علاج الموجات التصادمية على عكس علاج الليزر، سواء بمفردهما أو بالاشتراك مع ممارسة التمارين الاستطالة وتدليك الثلج،أظهر كلاهما فاعليه في تقليل ألم القدم وتحسين وظيفة القدم في مرضى التهاب صفاق الاخمص. علاج الموجات التصادمية أظهر أعلى فعالية. يُنصح بإجراء مزيد من البحوث بحجم عينات أكبر ومتابعة أطول للتأكد.

Issues also as CD.

Text in English and abstract in Arabic & English.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.