header
Image from OpenLibrary

Comparison of Methods between Automatic Urine Sediment Analyzer FUS-100/H-800 and Manual Urine Analysis Technique / Sarah Ahmed Lotfy Abdelaziz Hamed ; Supervised Asmaa Ismail Ahmed Ali , Heba Nabil Amin Baz

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Sarah Ahmed Lotfy Abdelaziz Hamed , 2014Description: 114 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • المقارنة بين طريقة تحليل البول التلقائية باستخدام جهاز الإف- يو {u٢٠١٣} إس 100/ {u2013} 800 و طريقة تحليل البول اليدوية [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Clinical and Chemical Pathology Summary: Background: Urine analysis is invaluable in diagnosis of urologic conditions as well as systemic disease affecting the kidneys. The volume of urine samples that clinical laboratories receive represents around 30% of the total sample volume. Microscopic urine sediment analysis has been the gold method for examining urine cells and particles. However, it is imprecise and has wide inter-observer variability, labor-intensive and time-consuming. Different analyzers are currently used to perform the task of automated urine analysis .These automated analyzers have been compared with the manual microscopic sediment examination. Aim of the Work: The aim of this study was to perform a comparison of methods between the automatic urine sediment analyzer H800-FUS100 and manual urine analysis technique for the examination of the formed elements in urine
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.07.M.Sc.2014.Sa.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110065300000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.07.M.Sc.2014.Sa.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 65300.CD Not for loan 01020110065300000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Clinical and Chemical Pathology

Background: Urine analysis is invaluable in diagnosis of urologic conditions as well as systemic disease affecting the kidneys. The volume of urine samples that clinical laboratories receive represents around 30% of the total sample volume. Microscopic urine sediment analysis has been the gold method for examining urine cells and particles. However, it is imprecise and has wide inter-observer variability, labor-intensive and time-consuming. Different analyzers are currently used to perform the task of automated urine analysis .These automated analyzers have been compared with the manual microscopic sediment examination. Aim of the Work: The aim of this study was to perform a comparison of methods between the automatic urine sediment analyzer H800-FUS100 and manual urine analysis technique for the examination of the formed elements in urine

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.