Trunk restraining versus balance training on reaching and hand function in stroke patients / Nagwa Ibrahim Mohammed Rehab ; Supervised Hussein Ahmed Shaker , Salah Sawan , Ebtesam Mohammed Fahmy
Material type:
- تقييد الجذع مقابل تدريب االتزان على وصول ووظيفة اليد فى مرضى السكتة الدماغية [Added title page title]
- Issued also as CD
Item type | Current library | Home library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.21.08.Ph.D.2014.Na.T (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not for loan | 01010110065790000 | ||
![]() |
مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.21.08.Ph.D.2014.Na.T (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 65790.CD | Not for loan | 01020110065790000 |
Browsing المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Neuromuscular and Neurosurgery
Back ground and Purpose: The ability to reach and grasp is a necessary component of many daily life functional tasks, hence reduced upper limb function has an impact on the ability to perform activities of daily living. In hemiparetic patients, the unrestricted and unguided repetition of a motor task may reinforce compensatory movements. Trunk restraint allowed the patients to use joint ranges that were present but not recruited during unrestrained reaching. This study aimed to compare the effect of trunk restraining versus balance training on improving active range of motion (ROM) during reach to grasp and hand function in stroke patients. Patients and methods: Forty -five stroke patients with age ranged from 40 to 55 years were included in the study. Patients were divided into three equal groups according to therapeutic intervention(GI, GII and GIII), GI received program of reach to grasp movements training during which compensatory movement of the trunk was prevented by trunk restraint, GII received the same program with balance training and without trunk restraint and GIII received the same program only. All patients were assessed for arm impairment using Fugl-Meyer scale, arm function using Upper Extremity Performance Test, gross and fine hand function using Box and Block test and Purdue Pegboard test respectively and for kinematic measures by two- dimensional motion analysis system during reach to grasp movement
Issued also as CD
There are no comments on this title.