header
Image from OpenLibrary

Bond strength, microleakage and penetration capability of adhesive bonding systems to primary tooth dentin / Ehab Ibrahim Eldessouqi ; Supervised Mervat Rashed , Ola Mostafa Omar , Osama Elshahawy

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Ehab Ibrahim Eldessouqi , 2014Description: 125 Leaves : charts . facsimiles ; 30cmOther title:
  • قَوة الرابطة والتسريب وقدرة الأختراق لأنظمة الربط اللاصقة لعاج السنة اللبنية [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Pedodontics Summary: Objective: The current study investigated the effect of using antibacterial MDPB containing and/or fluoride releasing self-etch adhesive systems on early bond strength and sealing ability of composite restoration to primary tooth dentin. Four self-etch adhesive systems; from the same manufacturer, were used: two; two-step (Fluoride-free adhesive [Clearfil SE Bond] and antibacterial MDPB containing and fluoride-releasing adhesive [Clearfil Protect Bond]) and two; one-step (Fluoride-free adhesive [Clearfil S3 Bond] and fluoride-releasing adhesive [Clearfil S3 Bond Plus]). Resin- dentin interface of these adhesives was also investigated. Results: In results, the microshear bond strength varied from 24.5 )±6.65( MPa for the fluoride-free two-step adhesive to 17.08 (±3.7) MPa for the antibacterial fluoride-releasing two-step adhesive, the latter being the only one that showed significantly lower bond strength value compared to the fluoride-free two-step and the fluoride-releasing one-step adhesives. On the other hand, there was no statistically significant difference in the degree of microleakage comparing the fluoride-free and fluoride-releasing adhesives. However, the sealing ability of two-step adhesives was better than one-step adhesive systems. SEM showed hybrid layer and resin tag formations in groups of mild two-step adhesives, whereas with milder one- step adhesives; their interaction with the underlying dentin was rather superficial with little or no resin tag formation.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.07.M.Sc.2014.Eh.B (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110065955000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.07.M.Sc.2014.Eh.B (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 65955.CD Not for loan 01020110065955000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Pedodontics

Objective: The current study investigated the effect of using antibacterial MDPB containing and/or fluoride releasing self-etch adhesive systems on early bond strength and sealing ability of composite restoration to primary tooth dentin. Four self-etch adhesive systems; from the same manufacturer, were used: two; two-step (Fluoride-free adhesive [Clearfil SE Bond] and antibacterial MDPB containing and fluoride-releasing adhesive [Clearfil Protect Bond]) and two; one-step (Fluoride-free adhesive [Clearfil S3 Bond] and fluoride-releasing adhesive [Clearfil S3 Bond Plus]). Resin- dentin interface of these adhesives was also investigated. Results: In results, the microshear bond strength varied from 24.5 )±6.65( MPa for the fluoride-free two-step adhesive to 17.08 (±3.7) MPa for the antibacterial fluoride-releasing two-step adhesive, the latter being the only one that showed significantly lower bond strength value compared to the fluoride-free two-step and the fluoride-releasing one-step adhesives. On the other hand, there was no statistically significant difference in the degree of microleakage comparing the fluoride-free and fluoride-releasing adhesives. However, the sealing ability of two-step adhesives was better than one-step adhesive systems. SEM showed hybrid layer and resin tag formations in groups of mild two-step adhesives, whereas with milder one- step adhesives; their interaction with the underlying dentin was rather superficial with little or no resin tag formation.

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.