header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Single port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy for suspected appendicitis / Emad Mohammed Nabiel Ali Ibrahim ; Supervised Mohamed Hassan Ali Fahmy , Mohamed Abdelmonem Amin Elmasry ,Mohammed Ahmed Mahmoud Raslan

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Emad Mohammed Nabiel Ali Ibrahim , 2015Description: 130 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • مقارنة بين استئصال الزائدة الدودية بالمنظار عن طريق مدخل واحد و طريقة المنظار التقليدية في حالات اشتباه التهاب الزائدة الدودية [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of General Surgery Summary: Randomized controlled clinical trial. Our study is conducted on 30 patients with suspected acute appendicitis, half of patients underwent conventional laparoscopic appendectomy while the other half appendectomy was done by single incision laparoscopic surgery. Assessment of length of the operation, safety, efficacy, wound cosmetic outcome, complications, postoperative pain control, length of hospitalization and patient satisfaction. The SILA cases average operative time was 83.75 ± 17.98 minutes taking less time than that in MLA cases which was 112.5 ± 38.08 minutes. The average operative times for SILA were competitive. The use of conventional straight instruments was in all MLA cases. While in SILA cases the instruments was according to the single access device, as straight instruments could be used in some single access device as GelPoint, while others require the use of prebent or articulating instruments as X - CONE single access device. Gas leakage is a very frustrating problem encountered with X - cone. And it may occur in the GelPort system with prolonged procedures.The rate of conversion from SILA to MLA was 13.33% (2 cases) using 2 additional ports due to difficulty in delivery of the appendix. Conversion rate to open, intra - operative complications, length of hospital stay was nearly the same in both groups. Post operative complications were comparable and nearly equal in both groups except for incisional hernia as there is higher incidence in SILA patients
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.14.M.Sc.2015.Em.S (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110067076000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.14.M.Sc.2015.Em.S (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 67076.CD Not for loan 01020110067076000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of General Surgery

Randomized controlled clinical trial. Our study is conducted on 30 patients with suspected acute appendicitis, half of patients underwent conventional laparoscopic appendectomy while the other half appendectomy was done by single incision laparoscopic surgery. Assessment of length of the operation, safety, efficacy, wound cosmetic outcome, complications, postoperative pain control, length of hospitalization and patient satisfaction. The SILA cases average operative time was 83.75 ± 17.98 minutes taking less time than that in MLA cases which was 112.5 ± 38.08 minutes. The average operative times for SILA were competitive. The use of conventional straight instruments was in all MLA cases. While in SILA cases the instruments was according to the single access device, as straight instruments could be used in some single access device as GelPoint, while others require the use of prebent or articulating instruments as X - CONE single access device. Gas leakage is a very frustrating problem encountered with X - cone. And it may occur in the GelPort system with prolonged procedures.The rate of conversion from SILA to MLA was 13.33% (2 cases) using 2 additional ports due to difficulty in delivery of the appendix. Conversion rate to open, intra - operative complications, length of hospital stay was nearly the same in both groups. Post operative complications were comparable and nearly equal in both groups except for incisional hernia as there is higher incidence in SILA patients

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image