header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Lidocaine phonophoresis versus progressive pressure release on upper trapezius myofascial trigger points / Alshimaa Shaaban Abdelazeim ; Supervised Omaima Mohamed Aly Kattabei , Ibrahim Moustafa Moustafa

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Alshimaa Shaaban Abdelazeim , 2015Description: 138 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • ماده الليدوكايين المدخلة بواسطه الموجات فوق الصوتيه مقابل الضغط المتصاعد على نقاط الألم العضلى الليفى فى الجزء العلوى من العضلة شبه المنحرفة [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science Summary: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of lidocaine phonophoresis to progressive pressure release on upper trapezius myofascial trigger points. Thirty six patients (20 females and 16 males) with active trigger points. Their age ranged from 20 to 30 years with a mean age (24.88 ± 3.50). Patients were randomly divided into three equal groups A, B and C. Group A received lidocaine phonophoresis for 5 minutes duration for four sessions. Group B received progressive pressure release technique for 2 minutes for four sessions. Group C (control group) didn{u2019}t receive any treatment. Pressure pain threshold (PPT), Neck disability index (NDI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) were used to evaluate patients at three intervals (pre treatment, post treatment and at two weeks follow up). Within group analysis there was significant difference of PPT, NDI and VAS at three group while (p < .05). At post treatment, the between group analysis revealed a significance difference between group in the favor of group A for PPT (A 117%, B 83% and C 33%), NDI (A 79%, B 54% and C 29%) and VAS (A 88.3, B 79% and C 33%). At follow up, there was a significance difference between group in the favor of group A for PPT (A 149%, B113% and C 52%), NDI (A 86%, B 47% and C 47%) and VAS (A 90%, B 74% and C 55%). Lidocaine phonophoresis is more effective than progressive pressure release in treatment of active trigger points at patients with myofascial pain syndrome
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.09.M.Sc.2015.Al.L (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110067222000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.09.M.Sc.2015.Al.L (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 67222.CD Not for loan 01020110067222000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of lidocaine phonophoresis to progressive pressure release on upper trapezius myofascial trigger points. Thirty six patients (20 females and 16 males) with active trigger points. Their age ranged from 20 to 30 years with a mean age (24.88 ± 3.50). Patients were randomly divided into three equal groups A, B and C. Group A received lidocaine phonophoresis for 5 minutes duration for four sessions. Group B received progressive pressure release technique for 2 minutes for four sessions. Group C (control group) didn{u2019}t receive any treatment. Pressure pain threshold (PPT), Neck disability index (NDI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) were used to evaluate patients at three intervals (pre treatment, post treatment and at two weeks follow up). Within group analysis there was significant difference of PPT, NDI and VAS at three group while (p < .05). At post treatment, the between group analysis revealed a significance difference between group in the favor of group A for PPT (A 117%, B 83% and C 33%), NDI (A 79%, B 54% and C 29%) and VAS (A 88.3, B 79% and C 33%). At follow up, there was a significance difference between group in the favor of group A for PPT (A 149%, B113% and C 52%), NDI (A 86%, B 47% and C 47%) and VAS (A 90%, B 74% and C 55%). Lidocaine phonophoresis is more effective than progressive pressure release in treatment of active trigger points at patients with myofascial pain syndrome

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image