Comparative study between Indiana pouch and ileal conduit as a method of cutaneous urinary diversion after radical cystectomy / Amr Abdullah Yusuf Nofal ; Supervised Amr Abdelmgeed Attia , Abdelmaksoud Mohamed Abdelmaksoud , Mohamed Salama Mohamed
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/617d1/617d1ff548fa5b7c4c2f0f011c0e0828846e60e2" alt="Text"
- دراسة مقارنة بين حقيبة انديانا وقناة اللفائفية كوسيلة من الوسائل الجلدية لتحويل البول بعد الاستئصال الجذرى لللمثانة البولية [Added title page title]
- Issued also as CD
Item type | Current library | Home library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.19.04.M.Sc.2015.Am.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not for loan | 01010110067286000 | ||
![]() |
مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.19.04.M.Sc.2015.Am.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 67286.CD | Not for loan | 01020110067286000 |
Browsing المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - National Cancer Institute - Department of Surgical Oncology
Our study conducted upon 80 patients compared two forms of cutaneous urinary diversion, 40 patients with ileal conduit and 40 patients with Indiana pouch, revealed that the Indiana pouch is viable and good alternatives as an ideal bladder substitute with better quality of life , well accepted , economically more suitable (no need for external bags), with good results in term of continence and accepted complications with satisfactory renal function
Issued also as CD
There are no comments on this title.