Rehabilitation of atrophic mandibular ridges with patient specific titanium implants : Non randomized clinical trial / Mohammed Atef Abdelrassoul ; Supervised Maha Mohamed Hakam , Adelhamdy Abouelfetouh
Material type: TextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Mohammed Atef Abdelrassoul , 2015Description: 105 P. : facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:- اعادة تأهيل ضمور الفك السفلي بمزدرعات تيتانيوم خاصة بالمريض : تجربة سريرية غير عشوائية [Added title page title]
- Issued also as CD
Item type | Current library | Home library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thesis | قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.09.13.Ph.D.2015.Mo.R (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not for loan | 01010110069048000 | |||
CD - Rom | مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.09.13.Ph.D.2015.Mo.R (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 69048.CD | Not for loan | 01020110069048000 |
Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
This study was designed to set up proper laser parameters including laser type, power intensity and time of application for glazing of a particular glass-ceramic. The effect of laser glazing of the glass-ceramics on structural, morphological and the topographical characteristics; roughness and hardness, and consequently optical properties was investigated, evaluated and compared with the recommended glazing technique. Two commercially available lithium disilicate ceramics; IPS E-max press and IPS E-max CAD, were used and fabricated by two different techniques: conventional lost wax (Injectable heat {u2013} pressed) and machinable Computer Aided Design / Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) techniques.A total number of 100 samples;50 for each material, (5mm diameter and 2 mm thickness) were fabricated. After discs fabrication, two glazing techniques were adopted to the ceramic samples namely; conventional glazing and laser glazing. Conventional glazing was conducted according to the manufacturer's instructions. Meanwhile, for laser glazing, CO₂ laser device was used where specimens were subjected to 20 watt Power using, 200 J Energy and 10 seconds application time repeated three times with a resting period of 10 seconds between each application. Ceramic samples were then evaluated and characterized using X-Ray Diffraction analysis and scanning electron microscope. Surface roughness evaluation before and after glazing was conducted using white light Profilometry. In addition, microhardness was measured using Vickers{u2019}s microhardness tester. Finally, color change measurement was done using Spectrophotometer
Issued also as CD
There are no comments on this title.