header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Microshear bond strength of glass-ionomer restoratives to normal and caries-affected dentin / Doaa Abdelaziz Shokry ; Supervised Enas Hussein Mobarak , Heba Ahmed Abdelwanis Eldeeb

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Doaa Abdelaziz Shokry , 2015Description: 76 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • قوة الربط الميكروقصية لترميمات الزجاج الايونمر لركائز العاج الطبيعى و المتأثر بالتسوس [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Operative Dentistry Summary: Introduction: This study was carried out to evaluate the microshear bond strength of two types of high viscous glass-ionomer restorative materials (conventional and filler modified) bonded to normal and caries-affected dentin.Results: Two-way ANOVA revealed no statistical significant difference between the two glass-ionomer restorations values [(Fuji IX GP; High viscous glass-ionomer) and (ChemFil Rock; Filler modified glass-ionomer)] (P= 0.06), and dentin substrates (normal and caries-affected dentin) (P= 0.32), as well as the interaction between the variables (materials and dentin substrates) was not statistically significant (P= 0.08). There was no statistical significant difference among the mean microshear bond strength values of the Fuji IX GP and ChemFil Rock glass-ionomer restoration bonded to both substrates (P= 0.07). For specimens of the Fuji IX GP glass-ionomer restoration bonded to normal and caries-affected dentin, the fractured specimens were mostly adhesive failure at dentin followed by mixed failure (adhesive at dentin side/cohesive failure in glass-ionomer restoration). While in the ChemFil Rock glass-ionomer restoration bonded to normal and caries-affected dentin, the fractured specimens were mostly mixed failure (adhesive failure at dentin side/cohesive in the adhesive layer/cohesive in cement) Conclusion: Under the conditions of this study, the following conclusions were drawn: 1.Filler modified glass-ionomer did not surpass the conventional high viscous glass-ionomer with regarding to the bond strength to both normal and caries-affected dentin. 2. Difference in dentin substrates (normal and caries-affected dentin) did not influence the bond strength of any of the tested glass-ionomer cements
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.03.M.Sc.2015.Do.M (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110069716000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.03.M.Sc.2015.Do.M (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 69716.CD Not for loan 01020110069716000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Operative Dentistry

Introduction: This study was carried out to evaluate the microshear bond strength of two types of high viscous glass-ionomer restorative materials (conventional and filler modified) bonded to normal and caries-affected dentin.Results: Two-way ANOVA revealed no statistical significant difference between the two glass-ionomer restorations values [(Fuji IX GP; High viscous glass-ionomer) and (ChemFil Rock; Filler modified glass-ionomer)] (P= 0.06), and dentin substrates (normal and caries-affected dentin) (P= 0.32), as well as the interaction between the variables (materials and dentin substrates) was not statistically significant (P= 0.08). There was no statistical significant difference among the mean microshear bond strength values of the Fuji IX GP and ChemFil Rock glass-ionomer restoration bonded to both substrates (P= 0.07). For specimens of the Fuji IX GP glass-ionomer restoration bonded to normal and caries-affected dentin, the fractured specimens were mostly adhesive failure at dentin followed by mixed failure (adhesive at dentin side/cohesive failure in glass-ionomer restoration). While in the ChemFil Rock glass-ionomer restoration bonded to normal and caries-affected dentin, the fractured specimens were mostly mixed failure (adhesive failure at dentin side/cohesive in the adhesive layer/cohesive in cement) Conclusion: Under the conditions of this study, the following conclusions were drawn: 1.Filler modified glass-ionomer did not surpass the conventional high viscous glass-ionomer with regarding to the bond strength to both normal and caries-affected dentin. 2. Difference in dentin substrates (normal and caries-affected dentin) did not influence the bond strength of any of the tested glass-ionomer cements

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image