header
Image from OpenLibrary

Mulligan{u2019}s mobilization with movement versus myofascial release on non specific neck pain / Maha Gamal Ibrahim Gomaa ; Supervised Soheir Shehata Rezk Allah , Ali Mohamed Elshafie Elzwahry , Ghada Abdelmoniem Abdelallah

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Maha Gamal Ibrahim Gomaa , 2016Description: 147 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • التحريك بطريقه موليجان مقابل الانفراج الليفى العضلى على آلام العنق الغير محددة [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science Summary: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of cervical Sustained Natural Apophoseal Glides with Myofascial Release on pain intensity, spinal mobility and function in patients with non-specific neck pain. Subjects: Forty five patient with non specific neck pain (21 males and 24 females), age ranged from 20 to 35 years participated in this study. They were assigned into three equal groups, 15 patients: Group A received cervical mobilization with movement (MWM) (Accompanied with stretching and strengthening exercises for upper cervical muscles, 12 sessions over four weeks, each other day) .Group B received cervical myofascial release (MFR) (Accompanied with the same stretching and strengthening exercises for upper cervical muscles , 12 sessions over four weeks, each other day).Group C received cervical stretching and strengthening exercises for upper cervical muscles only for 12 sessions over four weeks ,each other day .Methods: Visual analogue scale was used for assessment of pain intensity, Myrin OB goniometer was used for assessment of active cervical range of motion and neck disability index as an indication of neck functional ability. Measurements were taken before treatment and after 12 week of treatment Results: statistical analysis revealed that there was significant decrease in the pain intensity, neck disability index, and the active range of motion of the neck were significantly improved in group A and B .the control group has the least effect. Conclusion: Cervical mobilization with movement technique and Myofascial release technique for upper cervical muscles were safe and effective modalities, and have the same improvements in pain level, Range of motion and functional ability in patients with non specificneck pain
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.09.M.Sc.2016.Ma.M (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110069745000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.09.M.Sc.2016.Ma.M (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 69745.CD Not for loan 01020110069745000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of cervical Sustained Natural Apophoseal Glides with Myofascial Release on pain intensity, spinal mobility and function in patients with non-specific neck pain. Subjects: Forty five patient with non specific neck pain (21 males and 24 females), age ranged from 20 to 35 years participated in this study. They were assigned into three equal groups, 15 patients: Group A received cervical mobilization with movement (MWM) (Accompanied with stretching and strengthening exercises for upper cervical muscles, 12 sessions over four weeks, each other day) .Group B received cervical myofascial release (MFR) (Accompanied with the same stretching and strengthening exercises for upper cervical muscles , 12 sessions over four weeks, each other day).Group C received cervical stretching and strengthening exercises for upper cervical muscles only for 12 sessions over four weeks ,each other day .Methods: Visual analogue scale was used for assessment of pain intensity, Myrin OB goniometer was used for assessment of active cervical range of motion and neck disability index as an indication of neck functional ability. Measurements were taken before treatment and after 12 week of treatment Results: statistical analysis revealed that there was significant decrease in the pain intensity, neck disability index, and the active range of motion of the neck were significantly improved in group A and B .the control group has the least effect. Conclusion: Cervical mobilization with movement technique and Myofascial release technique for upper cervical muscles were safe and effective modalities, and have the same improvements in pain level, Range of motion and functional ability in patients with non specificneck pain

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.