header
Image from OpenLibrary

Study the effect of new design (Bullard) versus conventional telescopes on the biting force of implant-retained mandibular overdenture / Mohamed Mohamed Abdelmaksoud Aboheikal ; Supervised Mohamed Sabry Abdelaziz Badawy , Amr Hosny Elkhadem

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Mohamed Mohamed Abdelmaksoud Aboheikal , 2015Description: 109 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • دراسة تأثير التصميم البولارد التليسكوبى الحديث مقارنة بالتصميم التقليدى التليسكوبى على قوة العضة على الغرسة الداعمة للطقم الفوقى السفلى للتاج [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics Summary: Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare the effect of the biting force of implant-retained mandibular overdenture between the resilient Bullard telescopic implant retained mandibular overdenture versus the conventional rigid telescopic implant retained mandibular overdenture using the load sensor Methodology: Twenty patients with completely edentulous maxillary and mandibular arches were recruited. Two implants were installed at the lower canine regions after imaging the patients with pantographic xray wearing the scan appliance with two metallic balls inserted at the canine regions. Ten patients received conventional telescopic retained overdenture and the other received the Bullard telescopes. After delivery of the prosthesis, biting force was measured using the load star sensor at zero, 3 month and 6 month. Results: The Conventional telescopic design showed higher statistically significant values of biting force compared to Bullard telescopes. Conclusion: Rigid telescopic overdentures allow for statistically higher biting force value compared to the 2Bullard3 resilient telescopic overdenture
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.09.M.Sc.2015.Mo.S (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110070452000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.09.M.Sc.2015.Mo.S (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 70452.CD Not for loan 01020110070452000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics

Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare the effect of the biting force of implant-retained mandibular overdenture between the resilient Bullard telescopic implant retained mandibular overdenture versus the conventional rigid telescopic implant retained mandibular overdenture using the load sensor Methodology: Twenty patients with completely edentulous maxillary and mandibular arches were recruited. Two implants were installed at the lower canine regions after imaging the patients with pantographic xray wearing the scan appliance with two metallic balls inserted at the canine regions. Ten patients received conventional telescopic retained overdenture and the other received the Bullard telescopes. After delivery of the prosthesis, biting force was measured using the load star sensor at zero, 3 month and 6 month. Results: The Conventional telescopic design showed higher statistically significant values of biting force compared to Bullard telescopes. Conclusion: Rigid telescopic overdentures allow for statistically higher biting force value compared to the 2Bullard3 resilient telescopic overdenture

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.