Ross procedure versus mechanical aortic valve replacement shot and midterm results / Ahmed Salah ElDin Fouad ; Supervised Mostafa Radwan , Mohamed Rady AbuElEzz , Walid Gamal AbuSenna
Language: Eng Publication details: Cairo : Ahmed Salah ElDin Fouad , 2007Description: 160P : ill ; 25cmOther title:- مقارنة بين تغيير الصمام الاورطى مستخدما الصمام الرئوى او الصمام الاورطى الصناعى [Added title page title]
- Issued also as CD
Item type | Current library | Home library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.11.05.Ph.D.2007.Ah.R (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not for loan | 01010110046672000 | |||
![]() |
مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.11.05.Ph.D.2007.Ah.R (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 46672.CD | Not for loan | 01020110046672000 |
Browsing المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Thesis (PH.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty Of Medicine - Department Of Cardiothoracic Surgery
In our randomized cohort of young patients with aortic valve stenoses , the Ross procedure was superior to the mechanical prostheses with regard to hemodynamic performance However , this did not result in an accelerated left ventricular mass regression Clinical advantages like reduced valve - related complications and lesser myocardial strain will have to be proven in the long term
Issued also as CD
There are no comments on this title.