header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Low level laser therapy versus controlled mechanical loading on healing of tibial fracture / Heba Mohamed Rashad Mohamed ; Supervised Khaled Elsayed Ayad , Lamiaa Adel Salah Eldeen , Walid Reda Awadallah

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Heba Mohamed Rashad Mohamed , 2016Description: 117 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • العلاج بالليزر منخفض الشده مقابل التحميل الميكانيكى المراقب على التئام كسر الساق [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Musculoskeletal Disorders Summary: Tibia is the most exposed bone in the body and vulnerable to trauma, so its fractures are common among the long bone fractures and its management needs various approaches to allow bone healing. The current study seeks to compare between low level laser therapy (LLLT) and controlled mechanical loading on healing of tibial shaft fractures immobilized with an external fixator. 26 patients with tibial shaft fracture immobilized with an external fixator participated in current study. They were assigned randomly into two groups with 13 patients in each. Group (A) was the laser group and group (B) was the controlled mechanical loading group. In group (A) laser applied 1st day after immobilized with an external fixator. A continuous wave 904 nm infrared laser was used at dose 4 j/cm2 each point at fracture site for 9 sessions (6 session in1st week and 3 sessions (every other day) in 2nd week), each session was 5 minutes. In group (B) static controlled mechanical loading with 25%of patient weight was applied for 36 successive cycles for 9 sessions (6 sessions in1st week and 3 sessions (every other day) in 2nd week). Then data collected by dual energy x-ray (DEXA) which measure bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD), numerical rating scale (NRS) which measure pain and lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) which measure function of lower limb. The results of this study showed no significant difference in (BMC) and (BMD) between two groups but there are significant difference of numerical rating scale( NRS) & lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) in favor of group(A) when compared with group (B). Based on the results obtained in this study concluded that LLLT and mechanical controlled weight bearing had the same effect on bone healing, but LLLT has a greater effect on pain and LEFS
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.03.Ph.D.2016.He.L (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110071736000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.03.Ph.D.2016.He.L (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 71736.CD Not for loan 01020110071736000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Musculoskeletal Disorders

Tibia is the most exposed bone in the body and vulnerable to trauma, so its fractures are common among the long bone fractures and its management needs various approaches to allow bone healing. The current study seeks to compare between low level laser therapy (LLLT) and controlled mechanical loading on healing of tibial shaft fractures immobilized with an external fixator. 26 patients with tibial shaft fracture immobilized with an external fixator participated in current study. They were assigned randomly into two groups with 13 patients in each. Group (A) was the laser group and group (B) was the controlled mechanical loading group. In group (A) laser applied 1st day after immobilized with an external fixator. A continuous wave 904 nm infrared laser was used at dose 4 j/cm2 each point at fracture site for 9 sessions (6 session in1st week and 3 sessions (every other day) in 2nd week), each session was 5 minutes. In group (B) static controlled mechanical loading with 25%of patient weight was applied for 36 successive cycles for 9 sessions (6 sessions in1st week and 3 sessions (every other day) in 2nd week). Then data collected by dual energy x-ray (DEXA) which measure bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD), numerical rating scale (NRS) which measure pain and lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) which measure function of lower limb. The results of this study showed no significant difference in (BMC) and (BMD) between two groups but there are significant difference of numerical rating scale( NRS) & lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) in favor of group(A) when compared with group (B). Based on the results obtained in this study concluded that LLLT and mechanical controlled weight bearing had the same effect on bone healing, but LLLT has a greater effect on pain and LEFS

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image