header
Image from OpenLibrary

In vitro evaluation of manual and rotary NiTi retreatment systems in removing gutta-Percha obturated with root canal sealers / Anas Mohamed Mando ; Supervised Saeed M. Abdelaziz , Geraldine M. Ahmed

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Anas Mohamed Mando , 2016Description: 82 P. : charts , facsimiles , photographs ; 25cmOther title:
  • دراسة فى المختبر لتقيم الأدوات اليدوية و أدوات ماكينة الدوران فى إزالة حشو الجوتا بيرشا مع السمنتات ألاحمة للقناة الجذرية [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Endodontics Summary: Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of Manual technique (gates-glidden and hedstrom files), protaper universal rotary retreatment system and R-Endo retreatment system in removing gutta-percha with different canals sealer, zinc oxide eugenol and AH plus sealer. Materials and Method: Ninety-six extracted human roots were instrumented by ProTaper rotary files to (F3) and the samples were randomly divided into six groups of 16 roots for each groups A, B and C: gutta-percha and AH plus sealer, groups D, E and F: gutta-percha and endoseal. Removal of gutta-percha was performed the following techniques; (group A and D) ProTaper retreatment instruments, (group B and E) R-Endo instruments and (group C and F) gates-glidden with hedstrom files. The roots were split longitudinally. The area of remaining filling was evaluated by using stereomicroscope at three levels in the canal and time of retreatment was determined in each group. Results: No system completely removed the root filling material from root canal walls. No significant differences were observed between the rotary systems in terms of the area of filling material left within the canals (P>0.05). In case of middle third of the canal, groups reinstrumented by manual technique (C and F) showed significant when compared to groups (reinstrumented with protaper retreatment files (A and D). Conclusion: No system removed the root filling materials entirely. ProTaper files and R-endo were more efficient and faster than gates-glidden drills with H-files in root canal filling removal. Epoxy resin based sealer, was generally more difficult to remove than zinc-oxide and eugenol based sealer
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2016.An.I (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110071805000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2016.An.I (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 71805.CD Not for loan 01020110071805000
Browsing المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2016.Ah.P Postoperative pain following intracanal medications with 0.2% cetrimide gel compared to calcium hydroxide paste in patients with symptomatic apical periodontitis : A double blind randomized clinical trial / Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2016.Am.E Evaluation of extrusion of debris of oval canals using XP-Endo finisher after ProTaper NEXT® versus ProTaper NEXT® : In vitro study / Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2016.Am.E Evaluation of extrusion of debris of oval canals using XP-Endo finisher after ProTaper NEXT® versus ProTaper NEXT® : In vitro study / Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2016.An.I In vitro evaluation of manual and rotary NiTi retreatment systems in removing gutta-Percha obturated with root canal sealers / Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2016.An.I In vitro evaluation of manual and rotary NiTi retreatment systems in removing gutta-Percha obturated with root canal sealers / Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2016.Az.E Effect of occlusal reduction on postoperative pain in teeth with irreversible pulpitis and symptomatic apical periodontitis : A randomized clinical trial / Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2016.Az.E Effect of occlusal reduction on postoperative pain in teeth with irreversible pulpitis and symptomatic apical periodontitis : A randomized clinical trial /

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Endodontics

Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of Manual technique (gates-glidden and hedstrom files), protaper universal rotary retreatment system and R-Endo retreatment system in removing gutta-percha with different canals sealer, zinc oxide eugenol and AH plus sealer. Materials and Method: Ninety-six extracted human roots were instrumented by ProTaper rotary files to (F3) and the samples were randomly divided into six groups of 16 roots for each groups A, B and C: gutta-percha and AH plus sealer, groups D, E and F: gutta-percha and endoseal. Removal of gutta-percha was performed the following techniques; (group A and D) ProTaper retreatment instruments, (group B and E) R-Endo instruments and (group C and F) gates-glidden with hedstrom files. The roots were split longitudinally. The area of remaining filling was evaluated by using stereomicroscope at three levels in the canal and time of retreatment was determined in each group. Results: No system completely removed the root filling material from root canal walls. No significant differences were observed between the rotary systems in terms of the area of filling material left within the canals (P>0.05). In case of middle third of the canal, groups reinstrumented by manual technique (C and F) showed significant when compared to groups (reinstrumented with protaper retreatment files (A and D). Conclusion: No system removed the root filling materials entirely. ProTaper files and R-endo were more efficient and faster than gates-glidden drills with H-files in root canal filling removal. Epoxy resin based sealer, was generally more difficult to remove than zinc-oxide and eugenol based sealer

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.