header
Image from OpenLibrary

Comparison between augmented recession and posterior scleral fixation in partially accommodative esotropia / Huda Hussein Abdulrahman Alhayouti ; Supervised Hala Mostafa Elhilali , Ghada Ismail Gawdat , Ahmed Reda Awadein

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Huda Hussein Abdulrahman Alhayouti , 2016Description: 124 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • مقارنة بين زيادة انحسار العضلة المعزز و التثبيت الخلفى للعضلة فى الصلبة فى حالات الحول الأنسى التكيفى الجزئى [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Ophthalmology Summary: Partially accommodative esotropia is an esotropia that is not fully corrected by wearing full cycloplegic refraction. The aim of surgery for partially accommodative esotropia has been directed only at correcting the residual angle that was not corrected with glasses, i.e., the non-accommodative element. Three methods have been proposed for determination of the surgical target angle: standard surgery formula, augmented surgery formula and prism adaptation. Both the standard recession and the enhanced recessions led to high undercorrection rates. On the other hand, the augmented recession was known for its tendency to overcorrection. This was a prospective randomized interventional comparative study on patients with partially accommodative esotropia who have normal accommodative convergence to accommodation ratio Fifty-three patients with partially accommodative esotropia with normal were enrolled in this study. This study aimed to compare bilateral medial rectus recession, based on the distance angle with correction which is the smallest angle, reinforced by posterior scleral fixation to bilateral medial rectus augmented recession based an average between the distance angle with glasses and the near angle without glasses. The overall success in the Faden group was 64.29%; 35.71% were orthotropic with and without glasses and 28.57% were orthotropic with glasses but undercorrected without glasses. The overcorrection rate was 32.14% and the undercorrection rate 3.57%
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.24.Ph.D.2016.Hu.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110072630000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.24.Ph.D.2016.Hu.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 72630.CD Not for loan 01020110072630000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Ophthalmology

Partially accommodative esotropia is an esotropia that is not fully corrected by wearing full cycloplegic refraction. The aim of surgery for partially accommodative esotropia has been directed only at correcting the residual angle that was not corrected with glasses, i.e., the non-accommodative element. Three methods have been proposed for determination of the surgical target angle: standard surgery formula, augmented surgery formula and prism adaptation. Both the standard recession and the enhanced recessions led to high undercorrection rates. On the other hand, the augmented recession was known for its tendency to overcorrection. This was a prospective randomized interventional comparative study on patients with partially accommodative esotropia who have normal accommodative convergence to accommodation ratio Fifty-three patients with partially accommodative esotropia with normal were enrolled in this study. This study aimed to compare bilateral medial rectus recession, based on the distance angle with correction which is the smallest angle, reinforced by posterior scleral fixation to bilateral medial rectus augmented recession based an average between the distance angle with glasses and the near angle without glasses. The overall success in the Faden group was 64.29%; 35.71% were orthotropic with and without glasses and 28.57% were orthotropic with glasses but undercorrected without glasses. The overcorrection rate was 32.14% and the undercorrection rate 3.57%

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.