header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Effect of fat types and fat replacers on the quality and technological properties of oriental sausage / Hamdy Mohamed Bakry Abdelhady Zaki ; Supervised Amal Mohamed Abdelaziz Elsherif , Hussein Mohamed Hussein Mohamed

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Hamdy Mohamed Bakry Abdelhady Zaki , 2017Description: 137 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • تأثير أنواع الدهون وبدائلها علي الجودة والخصائص التكنولوجية للسجق الشرقي [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Veterinary Medicine - Department of Food Hygiene and Control Summary: Fat has an important role in the processing and sensory attributes of meat products. Therefore, the current study was designed to evaluate the effect of incorporating fats from different slaughtered food animals [beef (mesenteric and perinephric), buffalo (mesenteric and perinephric), Camel (mesenteric and hump) and mutton (mesenteric and perinephric) on the physicochemical and sensory as well as fatty acid profile of oriental beef sausages. Higher saturated fatty acids were recorded when fresh sausages processed using either buffalo or camel fats compared with those processed using beef or mutton fats. The highest level of Omega }3 was obtained when camel mesenteric fat was incorporated. Sensory attributes revealed superiority of sausages formulated using beef or sheep fat, meanwhile lower scores were obtained when camel or buffalo fat was used. Higher cooking loss% values were recorded when fresh sausages processed using either buffalo perinephric or camel hump fats compared with those processed using beef or mutton fats. The highest level of diameter reduction% was obtained when camel hump fat was incorporated followed by buffalo perinephric fat incorporation. Based on this study, sheep fats may be recommended for production of high quality acceptable fresh sausages. Buffalo perinephric and camel hump fats are not recommended for production of high quality acceptable fresh sausages in contrary to beef and sheep tallow. In the second part of the study chicken skin based fat replacers (chicken skin, chicken skin emulsion, gelatinized chicken skin and gelatinized chicken skin emulsion) were incorporated instead of fat and effect of their addition on the physicochemical and sensory as well as fatty acid profile were studied
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.10.06.Ph.D.2017.Ha.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110073347000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.10.06.Ph.D.2017.Ha.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 73347.CD Not for loan 01020110073347000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Veterinary Medicine - Department of Food Hygiene and Control

Fat has an important role in the processing and sensory attributes of meat products. Therefore, the current study was designed to evaluate the effect of incorporating fats from different slaughtered food animals [beef (mesenteric and perinephric), buffalo (mesenteric and perinephric), Camel (mesenteric and hump) and mutton (mesenteric and perinephric) on the physicochemical and sensory as well as fatty acid profile of oriental beef sausages. Higher saturated fatty acids were recorded when fresh sausages processed using either buffalo or camel fats compared with those processed using beef or mutton fats. The highest level of Omega }3 was obtained when camel mesenteric fat was incorporated. Sensory attributes revealed superiority of sausages formulated using beef or sheep fat, meanwhile lower scores were obtained when camel or buffalo fat was used. Higher cooking loss% values were recorded when fresh sausages processed using either buffalo perinephric or camel hump fats compared with those processed using beef or mutton fats. The highest level of diameter reduction% was obtained when camel hump fat was incorporated followed by buffalo perinephric fat incorporation. Based on this study, sheep fats may be recommended for production of high quality acceptable fresh sausages. Buffalo perinephric and camel hump fats are not recommended for production of high quality acceptable fresh sausages in contrary to beef and sheep tallow. In the second part of the study chicken skin based fat replacers (chicken skin, chicken skin emulsion, gelatinized chicken skin and gelatinized chicken skin emulsion) were incorporated instead of fat and effect of their addition on the physicochemical and sensory as well as fatty acid profile were studied

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image