header
Image from OpenLibrary

Objective evaluation of two hearing aid fitting formulae using tone burst auditory brainstem response and auditory steady state response / Mai Mohamed Elgohary ; Supervised Mohamed Ibrahim Shabana , Mona Hassan Selim , Salwa Mahmoud Abdellatif

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Mai Mohamed Elgohary , 2017Description: 156 P. : facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • التقييم الموضوعى للمعادلتين ظبط معينة السمع بإستخدام إختبارالإستجابة السمعية لجذع المخ و إختبار الإستجابة السمعية ذو الحالة المستقرة [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of E.N.T Summary: Introduction: Hearing aid benefit could be measured objectively by comparing aided and unaided measures and it can be measured subjectively with self-report measures. Objective measures are important for hearing assessment in individuals who are unable to provide behavioral responses to reach optimal hearing aids fitting verification. Study design: Prospective study. Objectives: This study was designed to compare the unaided and aided Auditory steady state response (ASSR) and tone burst auditory brainstem response (TB ABR) thresholds with the behavioral unaided and aided sound field audiometry in adult patients with sensorineural hearing loss using two non-linear hearing aid fitting formulae; DSL v5 and NAL-NL2. Then, to correlate the outcomes with the client orient scale of improvement (COSI) and abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB) questionnaires. Methods: This study included twenty hearing impaired adults, their hearing thresholds ranged from moderate to moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss and had previous experience with hearing aids. Their age ranged from eighteen to sixty years, and the mean duration of hearing aid experience was 3.85 ± 5.02 years. Subjects were examined in three scheduled sessions; unaided, aided NAL-NL2 and aided DSL V5. Each session was two months after the previous session. Each session included behavioral free field, TB ABR and ASSR testing. The patient satisfaction was assessed using COSI and APHAB questionnaires for each hearing aid fitting formulae
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.12.Ph.D.2017.Ma.O (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110073789000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.12.Ph.D.2017.Ma.O (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 73789.CD Not for loan 01020110073789000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of E.N.T

Introduction: Hearing aid benefit could be measured objectively by comparing aided and unaided measures and it can be measured subjectively with self-report measures. Objective measures are important for hearing assessment in individuals who are unable to provide behavioral responses to reach optimal hearing aids fitting verification. Study design: Prospective study. Objectives: This study was designed to compare the unaided and aided Auditory steady state response (ASSR) and tone burst auditory brainstem response (TB ABR) thresholds with the behavioral unaided and aided sound field audiometry in adult patients with sensorineural hearing loss using two non-linear hearing aid fitting formulae; DSL v5 and NAL-NL2. Then, to correlate the outcomes with the client orient scale of improvement (COSI) and abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB) questionnaires. Methods: This study included twenty hearing impaired adults, their hearing thresholds ranged from moderate to moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss and had previous experience with hearing aids. Their age ranged from eighteen to sixty years, and the mean duration of hearing aid experience was 3.85 ± 5.02 years. Subjects were examined in three scheduled sessions; unaided, aided NAL-NL2 and aided DSL V5. Each session was two months after the previous session. Each session included behavioral free field, TB ABR and ASSR testing. The patient satisfaction was assessed using COSI and APHAB questionnaires for each hearing aid fitting formulae

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.