header
Image from OpenLibrary

Evaluation of shear bond strength of composite resin used to repair zirconia with two different chemical surface treatment methods versus sandblasted zirconia : An in-vitro study / Aya Ezzat Mohamed Ali Elshimy ; Supervised Omnia Mohamed Abdelhamid Elsheihy , Maha Ahmed Taymour

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Aya Ezzat Mohamed Ali Elshimy , 2017Description: 93 P. : charts , photographs ; 25cmOther title:
  • تقييم قوة الربط القصية للراتنج المركب المستخدم لترميم الزركونيا بطريقتين مختلفتين من معالجة الأسطح كيميائيا مقارنة بالزركونيا المعالجة بالرمال : دراسة معملية [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics Summary: The aim of this in-vitro study is to assess the effect of two different priming agents on the shear bond strength (SBS) of composite resin used to repair zirconia compared to sandblasted zirconia. -Twenty four zirconia specimens (12{u00D7}10{u00D7}3 mm) were sliced from presintered zirconia blank using Isomet 98 machine then the specimens were sintered according to the manufacturer instructions. -The specimens were randomly divided into three groups according to the surface treatment performed; each group was 8 specimens as follow: Group (1) (control group): The specimens were subjected to sandblasting with 110om Al2O3 particles. Group (2) (RelyX group): The specimens were subjected to rely X ceramic primer. Group (3) (monobond plus group): The specimens were subjected to Monobond Plus primer. The specimens of group1 (control group) were subjected to airborne-particle abrasion with 110 om Al2O3 particles from a distance of 10 mm at a pressure of 2.8 bar for 15 seconds. The specimens of group2 were treated with rely X ceramic Primer with a clean bonding brush in a homogenous rubbing motion and left for 1 minute then gently air dried for 5 seconds. The specimens of group 3 were treated with monobond plus primer with a clean bonding brush in a homogenous rubbing motion and left for 1 minute then gently air dried for 5 seconds. The Te-Econom universal adhesive was applied on all specimens, air dried gently for 5 seconds and light cured for 30 seconds. The adhesion procedures were performed according to the manufacturer{u2019}s recommendations
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.09.M.Sc.2017.Ay.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110074984000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.09.M.Sc.2017.Ay.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 74984.CD Not for loan 01020110074984000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics

The aim of this in-vitro study is to assess the effect of two different priming agents on the shear bond strength (SBS) of composite resin used to repair zirconia compared to sandblasted zirconia. -Twenty four zirconia specimens (12{u00D7}10{u00D7}3 mm) were sliced from presintered zirconia blank using Isomet 98 machine then the specimens were sintered according to the manufacturer instructions. -The specimens were randomly divided into three groups according to the surface treatment performed; each group was 8 specimens as follow: Group (1) (control group): The specimens were subjected to sandblasting with 110om Al2O3 particles. Group (2) (RelyX group): The specimens were subjected to rely X ceramic primer. Group (3) (monobond plus group): The specimens were subjected to Monobond Plus primer. The specimens of group1 (control group) were subjected to airborne-particle abrasion with 110 om Al2O3 particles from a distance of 10 mm at a pressure of 2.8 bar for 15 seconds. The specimens of group2 were treated with rely X ceramic Primer with a clean bonding brush in a homogenous rubbing motion and left for 1 minute then gently air dried for 5 seconds. The specimens of group 3 were treated with monobond plus primer with a clean bonding brush in a homogenous rubbing motion and left for 1 minute then gently air dried for 5 seconds. The Te-Econom universal adhesive was applied on all specimens, air dried gently for 5 seconds and light cured for 30 seconds. The adhesion procedures were performed according to the manufacturer{u2019}s recommendations

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.