header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Precision and reproducibility of facial three-dimensional photogrammetry versus direct anthropmetry : A diagnostic accuracy study / Hadir Mohamed Galal Aboshady ; Supervised Mohammed Abdalalim Bushnaq , Fouad Ali Elsharaby , Fady Hussien Elsayed

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Hadir Mohamed Galal Aboshady , 2017Description: 108 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • دقة وقابلية تكرار نتائج المسح التصويري ثلاثي الأبعاد للوجه مقارنة بالقياسات البشرية المباشرة : دراسة دقة تشخصية [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Orthodontics Summary: Aim of the Study Evaluation of precision and reproducibility of the 3D facial images obtained from Planmeca ProMax 3D ProFace system by comparing them with direct anthropometry. Materials and Methods A diagnostic accuracy study was conducted including 46 participants (34 females and 34 males). They were imaged by Planmeca ProMax 3D ProFace system. 3D volumes obtained were uploaded on Planmeca Romexis 4.5.0.R software, 16 linear anthropometric measurements describing facial soft tissue parameters as described by Farkas were recorded. In addition, all participants had direct anthropometric measurements sessions using sliding and spreading calipers to record the same 16 linear anthropometric measurements. The digital measurements were repeated by the same operator twice with one week interval. Additionally, second observer repeated the same measurements to assess both intra and inter-observer reliability respectively. Mean values, mean difference and standard deviation with confidence interval 95% were estimated. For statistical analysis; Pearson correlation confident (r) and Bland-Altman test were used to evaluate the accuracy, Mean Absolute Difference (MAD) and Relative Error Magnitude were calculated to assess precision. For reprodcibilty; IntraClass Correlation Coefficient was done for Inter and Intra- observer reliability. Lastly for Bias assessment Paired t-test was calculated
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.06.M.Sc.2017.Ha.P (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110075191000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.06.M.Sc.2017.Ha.P (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 75191.CD Not for loan 01020110075191000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Orthodontics

Aim of the Study Evaluation of precision and reproducibility of the 3D facial images obtained from Planmeca ProMax 3D ProFace system by comparing them with direct anthropometry. Materials and Methods A diagnostic accuracy study was conducted including 46 participants (34 females and 34 males). They were imaged by Planmeca ProMax 3D ProFace system. 3D volumes obtained were uploaded on Planmeca Romexis 4.5.0.R software, 16 linear anthropometric measurements describing facial soft tissue parameters as described by Farkas were recorded. In addition, all participants had direct anthropometric measurements sessions using sliding and spreading calipers to record the same 16 linear anthropometric measurements. The digital measurements were repeated by the same operator twice with one week interval. Additionally, second observer repeated the same measurements to assess both intra and inter-observer reliability respectively. Mean values, mean difference and standard deviation with confidence interval 95% were estimated. For statistical analysis; Pearson correlation confident (r) and Bland-Altman test were used to evaluate the accuracy, Mean Absolute Difference (MAD) and Relative Error Magnitude were calculated to assess precision. For reprodcibilty; IntraClass Correlation Coefficient was done for Inter and Intra- observer reliability. Lastly for Bias assessment Paired t-test was calculated

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image