header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Effect of single impression technique versus split cast impression technique on speech outcome in maxillary obturators / Doaa Mahmoud Abdelhamid Elkady ; Supervised Cecil Gorgey , Ahmed Emad Fayyad , Heba Mahmoud Farag

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Doaa Mahmoud Abdelhamid Elkady , 2017Description: 112 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • تأثير طريقة الطبعة المفردة مقارنة بطريقة الطبعة مع استخدام القالب المشطور علي الناتج التخاطبى للسدات الفكية العلوية [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics Summary: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of using two different impression techniques on speech and patient satisfaction outcomes in maxillary definitive obturators constructed for patients with hard and soft palatal defects. Six patients were selected from the Maxillofacial Prosthodontics Unit, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University or referred from The National Cancer Institute. These patients exhibited unilateral hard palatal defect with complete absence of the soft palate. The selected patients were randomly distributed into two equal groups: Group I: The patients received first definitive skeleton obturator constructed according to the single impression technique then evaluation of speech outcome and patient satisfaction were carried out one week after the prosthesis insertion and then one month later. The prosthesis was then taken off from the patient for another one week and the obturator bulb was modified with the split cast impression technique. Group II: The patients received first definitive skeleton obturator constructed according to the split cast impression technique then evaluation of speech outcome and patient satisfaction were carried out one week after the prosthesis insertion and one month later, the prosthesis was then taken off from the patient for another one week and the obturator bulb was modified to accept the single impression technique. The protocol of assessment included: I. Auditory perceptual assessment of speech by the aid of phoniatric. II. Acoustic analysis of speech using : A) Spectrogram to evaluate the following parameters; 1. Energy.2. Duration. 3. VOT (Voice onset time). B)Nasometer to evaluate the degree of nasalance. III. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a patient satisfaction questionnaire which included the following questions: How would you evaluate the progress had been made with the prosthesis regarding the function? How would you rate the performance of the obturator regarding the retention? How would you rate the performance of the obturator regarding the stability? How much would you are satisfied with the comfort of the prosthesis? How much improvement you found in pronouncing words?
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.09.Ph.D.2017.Do.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110075559000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.09.Ph.D.2017.Do.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 75559.CD Not for loan 01020110075559000
Browsing المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
Cai01.09.09.Ph.D.2017.Al.I Impact of single implant versus two implants mandibular retained overdenture on denture retention and implant success rate in completely edentulous patients : A randomized controlled clinical trial / Cai01.09.09.Ph.D.2017.Bu.E Evalution of fracture resistance of cerasmart and lithium disilcate ceramic veneers with different incisal preparation designs : In vitro study / Cai01.09.09.Ph.D.2017.Bu.E Evalution of fracture resistance of cerasmart and lithium disilcate ceramic veneers with different incisal preparation designs : In vitro study / Cai01.09.09.Ph.D.2017.Do.E Effect of single impression technique versus split cast impression technique on speech outcome in maxillary obturators / Cai01.09.09.Ph.D.2017.Do.E Effect of single impression technique versus split cast impression technique on speech outcome in maxillary obturators / Cai01.09.09.Ph.D.2017.Em.A Assessment of fracture resistance and stress analysis of endodontically treated teeth restored using hybrid ceramic or resin nano-ceramic endocrowns compared to fiber post crown : In-vitro study / Cai01.09.09.Ph.D.2017.Em.A Assessment of fracture resistance and stress analysis of endodontically treated teeth restored using hybrid ceramic or resin nano-ceramic endocrowns compared to fiber post crown : In-vitro study /

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of using two different impression techniques on speech and patient satisfaction outcomes in maxillary definitive obturators constructed for patients with hard and soft palatal defects. Six patients were selected from the Maxillofacial Prosthodontics Unit, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University or referred from The National Cancer Institute. These patients exhibited unilateral hard palatal defect with complete absence of the soft palate. The selected patients were randomly distributed into two equal groups: Group I: The patients received first definitive skeleton obturator constructed according to the single impression technique then evaluation of speech outcome and patient satisfaction were carried out one week after the prosthesis insertion and then one month later. The prosthesis was then taken off from the patient for another one week and the obturator bulb was modified with the split cast impression technique. Group II: The patients received first definitive skeleton obturator constructed according to the split cast impression technique then evaluation of speech outcome and patient satisfaction were carried out one week after the prosthesis insertion and one month later, the prosthesis was then taken off from the patient for another one week and the obturator bulb was modified to accept the single impression technique. The protocol of assessment included: I. Auditory perceptual assessment of speech by the aid of phoniatric. II. Acoustic analysis of speech using : A) Spectrogram to evaluate the following parameters; 1. Energy.2. Duration. 3. VOT (Voice onset time). B)Nasometer to evaluate the degree of nasalance. III. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a patient satisfaction questionnaire which included the following questions: How would you evaluate the progress had been made with the prosthesis regarding the function? How would you rate the performance of the obturator regarding the retention? How would you rate the performance of the obturator regarding the stability? How much would you are satisfied with the comfort of the prosthesis? How much improvement you found in pronouncing words?

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image