header
Image from OpenLibrary

Assessment of push-out bond strength and interfacial adaptation of two new endodontic sealers; EndoSequence BC and MTA Fillapex to root canal dentine : An in vitro study / Tamer Nafiz Abdulghany Almqayyad ; Supervised Siza Yacoub Zakhary , Wafaa Ahmed Omar Segari

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Tamer Nafiz Abdulghany Almqayyad , 2017Description: 81 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • تق{u٠٦أأ}{u٠٦أأ}م قوة الربط والتك{u٠٦أأ}ف لمادتين لاصقتين جد{u٠٦أأ}دت{u٠٦أأ}ن لقنوات الجذور السنية من السيراميك الحيوي ومن اللاصق المقوى بمركب ثلاثي الأكاسيد المعدنية [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Endodontics Summary: Introduction: the aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate push-out bond strength and interfacial adaptation to dentine wall of EndoSequence BC (BC) and MTA Fillapex sealers compared to AH Plus sealer (AH+). Methods: sixty-six human extracted single rooted teeth with single root canal were selected and the crowns were removed at the level of CEJ to standardized the roots length (16 mm). Samples were instrumented using ProTaper universal NiTi rotary system up to size F5. After irrigation and smear layer removal samples were randomly divided according to tested sealer used into three groups of 22 sample each, and then obturated using lateral compaction technique and stored for 1 week before testing. Each group was subdivided according to test into two subgroups of 11 sample each, push-out test or interfacial adaptation. Data were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukay{u2019}s post-hoc test (P{u2264}0.05).Results: AH Plus has a statistically significant higher bond strength value than each of BC group and MTA Fillapex group. Regarding interfacial adaptation there was no statistically significant difference between the three sealers. Conclusion: BC bioceramic sealer, MTA Fillapex MTA based sealer showed their inferiority regarding push-out bond strength when compared to AH Plus resin based sealer. All of the three sealers showed different grades of gap width along the whole length of root canal wall
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2017.Ta.A (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110076169000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2017.Ta.A (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 76169.CD Not for loan 01020110076169000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Endodontics

Introduction: the aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate push-out bond strength and interfacial adaptation to dentine wall of EndoSequence BC (BC) and MTA Fillapex sealers compared to AH Plus sealer (AH+). Methods: sixty-six human extracted single rooted teeth with single root canal were selected and the crowns were removed at the level of CEJ to standardized the roots length (16 mm). Samples were instrumented using ProTaper universal NiTi rotary system up to size F5. After irrigation and smear layer removal samples were randomly divided according to tested sealer used into three groups of 22 sample each, and then obturated using lateral compaction technique and stored for 1 week before testing. Each group was subdivided according to test into two subgroups of 11 sample each, push-out test or interfacial adaptation. Data were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukay{u2019}s post-hoc test (P{u2264}0.05).Results: AH Plus has a statistically significant higher bond strength value than each of BC group and MTA Fillapex group. Regarding interfacial adaptation there was no statistically significant difference between the three sealers. Conclusion: BC bioceramic sealer, MTA Fillapex MTA based sealer showed their inferiority regarding push-out bond strength when compared to AH Plus resin based sealer. All of the three sealers showed different grades of gap width along the whole length of root canal wall

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.