header
Image from OpenLibrary

Nerve conduction studies versus ultrasonography for assessment of ulnar nerve neuropathy at the elbow / Reda Abdelrazek Ahmed ; Supervised Hala Rashad Elhabashy , Reem Atef Elhadidy , Sandra Mohamed Ahmed

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Reda Abdelrazek Ahmed , 2018Description: 201 P. : facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • دراسة التوصيل العصبى مقارنة بالموجات فوق الصوتية لتقييم إعتلال العصب الزندى عند المرفق [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Neurophysiology Summary: Background: Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) is the second most common entrapment neuropathy after entrapment of the median nerve. Ultrasonography is an evolving tool in the evaluation of peripheral nervous system, especially entrapment neuropathies. Objective: To investigate normative values of mixed nerve conduction study of the ulnar nerve at the elbow and to assess the role of ultrasonography in diagnosing and localizing ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Methods: Case control study was carried on 47 clinically affected ulnar nerves and 80 clinically non affected ulnar nerves. All subjects were subjected to routine and mixed nerve conduction studies (NCSs) of the ulnar nerve. Ultrasonography (US) examination to measure the maximum cross sectional area (CSA-max) of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. Results: The cutoff value of mixed nerve conduction velocity for the below elbow- above elbow segment was {u2264} 49 m/s. The cutoff value of (CSA-max) of the ulnar nerve found at 2.5 cm distal to the sulcus was >10.5 mm2. The sensitivity of routine (NCSs), mixed (NCSs) and (US) in diagnosing UNE measured versus clinical diagnosis were 70.2%, 78.7% and 82.9% respectively. The combined sensitivity and specificity of the routine and mixed (NCSs) in diagnosis of UNE were 93.9% and 55.2% respectively, while the combined sensitivity and specificity of the routine (NCSs) and (US) in diagnosis of UNE were 95% and 58.2% respectively
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.36.M.Sc.2018.Re.N (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110076318000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.36.M.Sc.2018.Re.N (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 76318.CD Not for loan 01020110076318000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Neurophysiology

Background: Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) is the second most common entrapment neuropathy after entrapment of the median nerve. Ultrasonography is an evolving tool in the evaluation of peripheral nervous system, especially entrapment neuropathies. Objective: To investigate normative values of mixed nerve conduction study of the ulnar nerve at the elbow and to assess the role of ultrasonography in diagnosing and localizing ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Methods: Case control study was carried on 47 clinically affected ulnar nerves and 80 clinically non affected ulnar nerves. All subjects were subjected to routine and mixed nerve conduction studies (NCSs) of the ulnar nerve. Ultrasonography (US) examination to measure the maximum cross sectional area (CSA-max) of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. Results: The cutoff value of mixed nerve conduction velocity for the below elbow- above elbow segment was {u2264} 49 m/s. The cutoff value of (CSA-max) of the ulnar nerve found at 2.5 cm distal to the sulcus was >10.5 mm2. The sensitivity of routine (NCSs), mixed (NCSs) and (US) in diagnosing UNE measured versus clinical diagnosis were 70.2%, 78.7% and 82.9% respectively. The combined sensitivity and specificity of the routine and mixed (NCSs) in diagnosis of UNE were 93.9% and 55.2% respectively, while the combined sensitivity and specificity of the routine (NCSs) and (US) in diagnosis of UNE were 95% and 58.2% respectively

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.