header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in detection of bone marrow involvement in pediatric hodgkin lymphoma / Omnia Magdy Youssef ; Supervised Hany Abdelrahman Sayed , Iman Ali Attia , Omnia Kamal Elgebaly

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Omnia Magdy Youssef , 2018Description: 98 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • دور التصوير المقطعي بالإطار البوزيتروني في اكتشاف مدى تأثر نخاع العظم في سرطان هودجكن الليمفاوي في الأطفال [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - National Cancer Institute - Department of Pediatric Oncology Summary: Purpose: Bone marrow biopsy (BMB) is the standard procedure to detect bone marrowinvolvement in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).The role of [18F]{uFB02}uorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET) is increasing for the initial staging of HL. We assessed whether routine BMB remains necessary with concomitant FDG-PET/CT. Methods:This retrospective analysis included advanced stage pediatric HL patients over a 6-year period extending from January 2010 till the end of December 2015.BMB results were correlated with FDG-PET/CT findings. Results:The study included 64 advanced stage pediatric HL, their PET/CT scans were positive for Bone marrow(BM) involvement in 35(54.7%) patients and negative in 29(45.3%) patients. BMB results were positive in 14 of 64 patients, only eight of them were identi{uFB01}ed by PET/CT. PET/CT had a sensitivity of 57.1% and a specificity of 46.0%. The positive predictive value was 22.9%, the negative predictive valuewas 79.3%, and the overall diagnostic accuracy was 48.4%. The median follow upwas around 28 months. There was no statistical difference in EFS between (BMB- PET/CT+) and (BMB+ PET/CT-) groups, (72.5% and 50%respectively, P value=0.41). There was no statistical difference in OS between (BMB- PET+) and (BMB+ PET/CT-) groups, (59.3% and 100% respectively, P value= 0.8). EFS didn{u2019}t show significant difference between PET positive (72%)and PET negative patients (76%), (P value = 0.37), but OS was 68.8% for PET positive and 96.6% for PET negative patients (P value= 0.06)
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.19.05.M.Sc.2018.Om. R (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110076367000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.19.05.M.Sc.2018.Om. R (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 76367.CD Not for loan 01020110076367000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - National Cancer Institute - Department of Pediatric Oncology

Purpose: Bone marrow biopsy (BMB) is the standard procedure to detect bone marrowinvolvement in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).The role of [18F]{uFB02}uorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET) is increasing for the initial staging of HL. We assessed whether routine BMB remains necessary with concomitant FDG-PET/CT. Methods:This retrospective analysis included advanced stage pediatric HL patients over a 6-year period extending from January 2010 till the end of December 2015.BMB results were correlated with FDG-PET/CT findings. Results:The study included 64 advanced stage pediatric HL, their PET/CT scans were positive for Bone marrow(BM) involvement in 35(54.7%) patients and negative in 29(45.3%) patients. BMB results were positive in 14 of 64 patients, only eight of them were identi{uFB01}ed by PET/CT. PET/CT had a sensitivity of 57.1% and a specificity of 46.0%. The positive predictive value was 22.9%, the negative predictive valuewas 79.3%, and the overall diagnostic accuracy was 48.4%. The median follow upwas around 28 months. There was no statistical difference in EFS between (BMB- PET/CT+) and (BMB+ PET/CT-) groups, (72.5% and 50%respectively, P value=0.41). There was no statistical difference in OS between (BMB- PET+) and (BMB+ PET/CT-) groups, (59.3% and 100% respectively, P value= 0.8). EFS didn{u2019}t show significant difference between PET positive (72%)and PET negative patients (76%), (P value = 0.37), but OS was 68.8% for PET positive and 96.6% for PET negative patients (P value= 0.06)

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image