header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Maxillary sinus elevation using gelfoam (absorbable gelatin) versus xenograft (tutogen) with simultaneous implant placement : randomized clinical trial / Fatma Fawzy Kandel ; Supervised Niveen Asker, Mohammed Atef

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Fatma Fawzy Kandel , 2018Description: 97 P. : charts , facsimiles , photographs ; 25cmOther title:
  • رفع جدارالجيب الأنفى مع الزرع المباشر لغرسه سنيه لمقارنة الطعم الاجنبى وهلام الرغوة : دراسة سريرية [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Summary: Background : Different grafting techniques and materials have been proposed for elevation and augmentation of maxillary sinus floor to solve the problem of inadequate alveolar bone quantity which hinders the placement of root form end osseous dental implants in atrophic posterior maxilla. Purpose The aim of the present study to compare gelfoam(absorbable gelatin sponge) as a space filling material versus xenograft (Tutogen) in augmentation and elevation of maxillary sinus floor with simultaneous implant placement. Material and Methods Eighteen cases of maxillary sinus floor elevation were randomly divided into 2 groups. The first group received xenograft as grafting material through lateral window approach with simultaneous implant placement while the second group received gelfoam as a space maintainer through lateral window approach with simultaneous implant placement and titanium mesh as non resorbable membrane used for closure of the lateral window in both groups. CBCT were obtained immediately postoperative and 6 months after operation to measure bone height gained and gray scale value. Osstell readings were taken at the time of implant placement and implant exposure (6 months) to measure implant stability
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2018.Fa.M (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110076539000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2018.Fa.M (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 76539.CD Not for loan 01020110076539000
Browsing المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2018.Em.E Evaluation of the use of platelet rich plasma (PRP) bio activated implant surfaces for enhancement of healing after immediate loading versus non coated implant in mandibular posterior area : A randomized clinical trial / Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2018.Es.E Evaluation of simvastatin effect on osseointegration of dental implants / Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2018.Es.E Evaluation of simvastatin effect on osseointegration of dental implants / Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2018.Fa.M Maxillary sinus elevation using gelfoam (absorbable gelatin) versus xenograft (tutogen) with simultaneous implant placement : randomized clinical trial / Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2018.Fa.M Maxillary sinus elevation using gelfoam (absorbable gelatin) versus xenograft (tutogen) with simultaneous implant placement : randomized clinical trial / Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2018.Ha.E Evaluation of pain regression in patients with myofascial facial pain treated by dry needling versus local anesthetic injections : A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial / Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2018.Ha.E Evaluation of pain regression in patients with myofascial facial pain treated by dry needling versus local anesthetic injections : A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial /

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Background : Different grafting techniques and materials have been proposed for elevation and augmentation of maxillary sinus floor to solve the problem of inadequate alveolar bone quantity which hinders the placement of root form end osseous dental implants in atrophic posterior maxilla. Purpose The aim of the present study to compare gelfoam(absorbable gelatin sponge) as a space filling material versus xenograft (Tutogen) in augmentation and elevation of maxillary sinus floor with simultaneous implant placement. Material and Methods Eighteen cases of maxillary sinus floor elevation were randomly divided into 2 groups. The first group received xenograft as grafting material through lateral window approach with simultaneous implant placement while the second group received gelfoam as a space maintainer through lateral window approach with simultaneous implant placement and titanium mesh as non resorbable membrane used for closure of the lateral window in both groups. CBCT were obtained immediately postoperative and 6 months after operation to measure bone height gained and gray scale value. Osstell readings were taken at the time of implant placement and implant exposure (6 months) to measure implant stability

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image