header
Image from OpenLibrary

Comparative study between three different laparoscopic entry methods in gynecology / Walaa Ashour Abdelhay Elsherief ; Supervised Ahmed Elminawi , Amal Darwish , Hadeer Mashaal

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Walaa Ashour Abdelhay Elsherief , 2018Description: 100 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • دراسه مقارنه بين ثلاثه طرق مختلفه لأدخال منظار البطن فى امراض النساء [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Summary: Objective: To compare the complications rate of three different laparoscopic entry methods: classic closed laparoscopy, left upper quadrant entry and open laparoscopy. Patients and methods: Sixty patients underwent elective laparoscopic surgery at the Obstetrics and Gynecology department, Kasr Al-ainy Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University after obtaining their informed consents.The study was done starting from May 2015 till May 2017. They were randomized in to three groups: -20 patients were assigned to classic closed laparoscopy. -20 patients were assigned to open laparoscopy.- 20 patients were assigned to left upper quadrant entry. The main outcome measures were statistically compared: time required for entry into abdomen and occurrence of vascular and/or bowel injury. All patients had intraperitoneal view of the primary port site during surgical procedure. Results: Statistical differences, in favor of the classic closed laparoscopy and lef upper quadrant entry (P < .01), were found in duration of entry. The surgical complications in classic closed laparoscopy versus left upper quadrant entry versus open laparoscopy were not statistically different
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.15.M.Sc.2018.Wa.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110076666000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.15.M.Sc.2018.Wa.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 76666.CD Not for loan 01020110076666000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Objective: To compare the complications rate of three different laparoscopic entry methods: classic closed laparoscopy, left upper quadrant entry and open laparoscopy. Patients and methods: Sixty patients underwent elective laparoscopic surgery at the Obstetrics and Gynecology department, Kasr Al-ainy Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University after obtaining their informed consents.The study was done starting from May 2015 till May 2017. They were randomized in to three groups: -20 patients were assigned to classic closed laparoscopy. -20 patients were assigned to open laparoscopy.- 20 patients were assigned to left upper quadrant entry. The main outcome measures were statistically compared: time required for entry into abdomen and occurrence of vascular and/or bowel injury. All patients had intraperitoneal view of the primary port site during surgical procedure. Results: Statistical differences, in favor of the classic closed laparoscopy and lef upper quadrant entry (P < .01), were found in duration of entry. The surgical complications in classic closed laparoscopy versus left upper quadrant entry versus open laparoscopy were not statistically different

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.