header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Evaluation of pain regression in patients with myofascial facial pain treated by dry needling versus local anesthetic injections : A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial / Hassan Fahmy Hassan Alnimr ; Supervised Hamida Refai Hassanien , Omniya Abdelaziz

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Hassan Fahmy Hassan Alnimr , 2018Description: 111 P. : photographs ; 25cmOther title:
  • تقييم تراجع الألم فى المرضى الذين يعانون من الألم الليفى العضلى و ذلك عن طريق العلاج بواسطة الوخز بالابر الصينية مقابل الحقن بالمخدر الموضعى : تجربة منضبطة معشّاة [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Summary: To date, there is no standard therapeutic protocol for the treatment of MTrPs and different alternatives have been suggested. This draw the attention of many investigators to assess and compare some of the therapies used for MTrPs deactivation with a view for establishing more effective alternatives for the treatment of MTrP. Therefore, it was the aim of the present study to evaluate and compare two forms of treatment for inactivation of MTrPs: DN and LA injection. Although the comparison between these two methods was the topic of several studies, their results showed great controversy. 100 eligible patients with active MTrPs within the jaw muscles were randomly allocated to one of two study arms with 1:1 allocation ratio by using computerized sequence generation: the 'intervention' group who underwent DN of the TrPs or the control group who underwent Mepivacaine injection of the TrPs. Sixty patients dropped out throughout the trial. This resulted in a study sample which consisted of 40 patients, 20 patients in each group, of both genders (37 females and 3 males), aged between 14-50 years (average of 30.17 years). Each patient in both groups received 3 treatment sessions at an interval of 2 days in the first week, 2 treatment sessions at an interval of 3 days in the second week and one treatment session at the end of the third week. For both groups, the evaluation was realized in three moments: preoperatively (T1) as well as one week (T2) and 12 weeks (T3) after the end of the treatment sessions. The primary outcomes were the patients{u2019} current and worst pain intensity and PPT. The secondary outcome was the MMO
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2018.Ha.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110076723000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2018.Ha.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 76723.CD Not for loan 01020110076723000
Browsing المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2018.Fa.M Maxillary sinus elevation using gelfoam (absorbable gelatin) versus xenograft (tutogen) with simultaneous implant placement : randomized clinical trial / Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2018.Fa.M Maxillary sinus elevation using gelfoam (absorbable gelatin) versus xenograft (tutogen) with simultaneous implant placement : randomized clinical trial / Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2018.Ha.E Evaluation of pain regression in patients with myofascial facial pain treated by dry needling versus local anesthetic injections : A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial / Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2018.Ha.E Evaluation of pain regression in patients with myofascial facial pain treated by dry needling versus local anesthetic injections : A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial / Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2018.Ha.E Evaluation of the role of platelet- rich fibrin (PRF) on wound healing following primary cleft palate repair : A pilot study / Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2018.Ha.E Evaluation of the role of platelet- rich fibrin (PRF) on wound healing following primary cleft palate repair : A pilot study / Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2018.Ha.E Evaluation of primary stability in immediate non submerged root analogue zirconium implants : A preliminary study /

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

To date, there is no standard therapeutic protocol for the treatment of MTrPs and different alternatives have been suggested. This draw the attention of many investigators to assess and compare some of the therapies used for MTrPs deactivation with a view for establishing more effective alternatives for the treatment of MTrP. Therefore, it was the aim of the present study to evaluate and compare two forms of treatment for inactivation of MTrPs: DN and LA injection. Although the comparison between these two methods was the topic of several studies, their results showed great controversy. 100 eligible patients with active MTrPs within the jaw muscles were randomly allocated to one of two study arms with 1:1 allocation ratio by using computerized sequence generation: the 'intervention' group who underwent DN of the TrPs or the control group who underwent Mepivacaine injection of the TrPs. Sixty patients dropped out throughout the trial. This resulted in a study sample which consisted of 40 patients, 20 patients in each group, of both genders (37 females and 3 males), aged between 14-50 years (average of 30.17 years). Each patient in both groups received 3 treatment sessions at an interval of 2 days in the first week, 2 treatment sessions at an interval of 3 days in the second week and one treatment session at the end of the third week. For both groups, the evaluation was realized in three moments: preoperatively (T1) as well as one week (T2) and 12 weeks (T3) after the end of the treatment sessions. The primary outcomes were the patients{u2019} current and worst pain intensity and PPT. The secondary outcome was the MMO

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image