header
Image from OpenLibrary

Interpositional autogenous inlay blok graft versus autogenous block graft for lateral ridge augmentation : A randomized clinical trial / Ahmed Hesham Osman ; Supervised Maha Mohamad Hakam , Mohammed Atef Abdelrasool

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Ahmed Hesham Osman , 2018Description: 79 P. : facsimiles , photoghraphs ; 25cmOther title:
  • تجربه سريريه عشوائية لمقارنة الرقعة العظمية الداخلية بالرقعة العضمية المرصعة لزيادة عرض العظم الس نخي في الفك السفلي [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Summary: The present study is a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of horizontal mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation by interpositional block graft versus onlay block graft harvested from the mandibular symphesis.Twenty patients seeking implant rehabilitation for the mandible were selected from the outpatient clinic of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University.10 sites were horizontal augmented by interpositional block graft and the other 10 sites were augmented using onlay block graft. All patients were regularly assessed both clinically and radiographically upto 4 months post-operatively. Statistical analysis showed that both techniques showed a significant increase in alveolar bone width immediately post operative and at 4 months.The mean graft resorption in the interpositional group 4 months post operative was considered non significant while in the onlay group the mean graft resorption was significant. Thus within the limits of this study the following could be concluded: {u271E}Interpositional block grafts offers a viable alternative for mandibular horizontal ridge augmentation compared to onlay bone graft {u271E}Interpositional graft is a more technique sensitive procedure as compared to onlay block graft and requires certain level of surgical experience to be performed successfully
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2018.Ah.I (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110077442000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2018.Ah.I (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 77442.CD Not for loan 01020110077442000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

The present study is a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of horizontal mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation by interpositional block graft versus onlay block graft harvested from the mandibular symphesis.Twenty patients seeking implant rehabilitation for the mandible were selected from the outpatient clinic of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University.10 sites were horizontal augmented by interpositional block graft and the other 10 sites were augmented using onlay block graft. All patients were regularly assessed both clinically and radiographically upto 4 months post-operatively. Statistical analysis showed that both techniques showed a significant increase in alveolar bone width immediately post operative and at 4 months.The mean graft resorption in the interpositional group 4 months post operative was considered non significant while in the onlay group the mean graft resorption was significant. Thus within the limits of this study the following could be concluded: {u271E}Interpositional block grafts offers a viable alternative for mandibular horizontal ridge augmentation compared to onlay bone graft {u271E}Interpositional graft is a more technique sensitive procedure as compared to onlay block graft and requires certain level of surgical experience to be performed successfully

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.