header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Patient satisfaction of metallic versus injectable thermoplastic resin obturator frameworks in maxillectomy patients : A cross over randomized clinical trial / Ahmed Abdelsalam Hussein ; Supervised Cecile Gorgy Michael , Iman Abdelwahab Rady

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Ahmed Abdelsalam Hussein , 2018Description: 81 P. : facsimiles , photoghraphs ; 25cmOther title:
  • قياس رضى مرضى الازالة الجزئية للفك العلوي بالمسد الحنكى ذو الهيكل المعدني مقابل المسد الحنكى ذوالهيكل المحقون من راتنج اللدائن الحرارية : تجربة عشوائية مراقبة تعابرية [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics Summary: Aim of the study: This cross over randomized clinical trial was conducted to compare maxillary conventional metal obturator frameworks and injectable thermoplastic resin obturator framework regarding patient{u2019}s satisfaction and marginal bone loss. Materials and methods: Sixteen hemimaxillectomy (Aramany class I & II) patients ,satisfying the eligibility criteria were randomly assigned into two groups, to investigate the effect of the framework materials on patient satisfaction and marginal bone loss. One group (group V) patients received metallic frameworks at first and switched to thermoplastic resin frameworks. In group T patients started with thermoplastic resin then switched to metal frameworks. Patient satisfaction was recorded using a printed questionnaire at 0, 3 and 6 months of obturator insertion, while marginal bone loss was recorded using Digora system at 0 and six months of obturator insertion.Results: Results of this trial showed that no statistical significant difference between metal and thermoplastic resin obturator frameworks, regarding patient satisfaction and marginal bone loss around abutments
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.09.M.Sc.2018.Ah.P (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110077443000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.09.M.Sc.2018.Ah.P (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 77443.CD Not for loan 01020110077443000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics

Aim of the study: This cross over randomized clinical trial was conducted to compare maxillary conventional metal obturator frameworks and injectable thermoplastic resin obturator framework regarding patient{u2019}s satisfaction and marginal bone loss. Materials and methods: Sixteen hemimaxillectomy (Aramany class I & II) patients ,satisfying the eligibility criteria were randomly assigned into two groups, to investigate the effect of the framework materials on patient satisfaction and marginal bone loss. One group (group V) patients received metallic frameworks at first and switched to thermoplastic resin frameworks. In group T patients started with thermoplastic resin then switched to metal frameworks. Patient satisfaction was recorded using a printed questionnaire at 0, 3 and 6 months of obturator insertion, while marginal bone loss was recorded using Digora system at 0 and six months of obturator insertion.Results: Results of this trial showed that no statistical significant difference between metal and thermoplastic resin obturator frameworks, regarding patient satisfaction and marginal bone loss around abutments

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image