header
Image from OpenLibrary

Guiding fluid management in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury : Role of noninvasive assessment of stroke volume / Ihab Abdelrahman Alsayed ; Supervised Rania Mostafa Alhusseiny , Hassan Sameer Effat , Waleed Farouk Mahmoud

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Ihab Abdelrahman Alsayed Morsi , 2018Description: 122 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • القياس الغير نافذ لحجم دفق الدم القلبى كمؤشر إسترشادى لكمية السوائل المعطاة و ريدياً لمرضى الإصابة الكلوية الحادة [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Critical Care Medicine Summary: Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs in up to 50 % of patients admitted to the intensive care units. Optimization of volume status is a challenging step in management of AKI patients. Methods: This study was conducted on 40 critically ill patients with AKI. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: Group A; volume status was optimized by CVP/{u25B2}CVP and Group B; volume status was optimized by passive leg raising (PLR) and fluid challenge induced stroke volume variation (SVV) using echocardiography. Both groups were compared regarding outcome. Results: No significant difference in both groups regarding any of the baseline characteristics. Group A received more fluids compared to group B after 48 h (3.7 ± 0.7 VS 2.2 ± 0.6 liters respectively, p < 0.001). This was associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In group A, the need for mechanical ventilation (MV) was higher (p 0.048), the duration of MV was longer (p 0.04) with larger number of patients failed weaning (p 0.036). The need for vasopressors was higher in group A (p 0.019) with more patients in need for RRT compared to group B, but it didn{u2019}t reach statistical significance (p 0.2). No difference between the two groups regarding the length of ICU stay (12.10 ± 11.83 days in group A versus 6.35 ± 3.86 group B, P value 0.183). However, the mortality rate was higher in group A (40%) compared to group B (10%), p 0.028
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.09.M.Sc.2018.Ih.G (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110077670000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.09.M.Sc.2018.Ih.G (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 77670.CD Not for loan 01020110077670000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Critical Care Medicine

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs in up to 50 % of patients admitted to the intensive care units. Optimization of volume status is a challenging step in management of AKI patients. Methods: This study was conducted on 40 critically ill patients with AKI. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: Group A; volume status was optimized by CVP/{u25B2}CVP and Group B; volume status was optimized by passive leg raising (PLR) and fluid challenge induced stroke volume variation (SVV) using echocardiography. Both groups were compared regarding outcome. Results: No significant difference in both groups regarding any of the baseline characteristics. Group A received more fluids compared to group B after 48 h (3.7 ± 0.7 VS 2.2 ± 0.6 liters respectively, p < 0.001). This was associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In group A, the need for mechanical ventilation (MV) was higher (p 0.048), the duration of MV was longer (p 0.04) with larger number of patients failed weaning (p 0.036). The need for vasopressors was higher in group A (p 0.019) with more patients in need for RRT compared to group B, but it didn{u2019}t reach statistical significance (p 0.2). No difference between the two groups regarding the length of ICU stay (12.10 ± 11.83 days in group A versus 6.35 ± 3.86 group B, P value 0.183). However, the mortality rate was higher in group A (40%) compared to group B (10%), p 0.028

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.