Laparoscopic myomectomyusing barbedversus conventional sutures : A randomized controlled study / Fatma Mohamed Sayed Ibrahim Mansour ; Supervised Mohamed Zayed Abdelaziz , Usama Mohamed Fikry Fouda , Khaled Ahmed Abdelaziz Elsetohy
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/617d1/617d1ff548fa5b7c4c2f0f011c0e0828846e60e2" alt="Text"
- استئصال الورم الليفي بمنظار البطن باستخدام الخيوط الشائكة مقابل الخيوط المعتادة : دراسة عشوائية محكمة [Added title page title]
- Issued also as CD
Item type | Current library | Home library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.11.15.Ph.D.2018.Fa.L (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not for loan | 01010110078185000 | ||
![]() |
مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.11.15.Ph.D.2018.Fa.L (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 78185.CD | Not for loan | 01020110078185000 |
Browsing المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Objectives:to compare operative data and early postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic myomectomy using barbed sutures with those of laparoscopic myomectomy using conventional sutures. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: Obstetrics and Gynecology hospital, Cairo university , Egypt. Patients:54 patients with (1-3) symptomatic myomas (max. diameter{u2264} 10cm) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to thebarbed suture group(n=27) or the conventional suture group(n=27). Interventions:The patients underwent LM and the myoma bed was sutured either with barbed suture (V-Loc or stratafix) or conventional suture (Vicryl). Measurements and Main Results: Suturing time of the myoma bed wassignificantly shorter in the barbed suture group(14.15±5.08versus 19.41±7minutes ; p =0. 002).There was no statistically significant difference in the meanoperative time in both groups (65.67±18.07versus 71.15±21.5minutes; p =0.315).There was statistically significant difference in the meanblood loss in both groups (209.63±110.65versus 329.44±224.96 ml; p =0.017).No intra or early post operative complicationswere reported in either groups
Issued also as CD
There are no comments on this title.