Impact of different pelvic floor exercises positions on women with stress urinary incontinence / Silvia No'man Toos ; Supervised Amel Mohamed Youssef , Asmaa Mahmoud Aly , Ahmed Mohamed Bahaa Eldin
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/617d1/617d1ff548fa5b7c4c2f0f011c0e0828846e60e2" alt="Text"
- تأثير الأوضاع المختلفة لممارسة تمرينات قاع الحوض علي النساء اللاتي تعانين من سلس البول الاجهادي [Added title page title]
- Issued also as CD
Item type | Current library | Home library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.21.04.M.Sc.2019.Si.I (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not for loan | 01010110078788000 | |||
![]() |
مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.21.04.M.Sc.2019.Si.I (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 78788.CD | Not for loan | 01020110078788000 |
Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Graduates and Obstetrics
Background and Purpose: Pelvic floor muscle exercises are used to rehabilitate and strength pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) and promote urine storage. Pelvic floor muscle demands may be influenced by position. Objective: Prospective study to objectively evaluate impact of different pelvic floor exercises positions on women with stress urinary incontinence Materials and Methods: Forty-five women at the age of 40-50 years assigned to three groups diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) were selected for this study, their body mass index (BMI) was <30 kg/m².They were randomly assigned to exercise in the crock lying position (A), standing position (B) or sitting position (C). The treatment program was done three times per week for 12 weeks. Squeeze vaginal pressure and Revised urinary incontinence scale (RUIS) outcomes were obtained at baseline and after treatment. Results: Showed a statistically significant increase (P<0.001) in the mean value of squeeze vaginal pressure and a statistical significant decrease (P<0.001) in the mean value of (RUIS) in all groups (A, B& C) after treatment. Between groups, there were significant differences in all groups before and after treatment but in favor of group A (P<0.001)
Issued also as CD
There are no comments on this title.