header
Image from OpenLibrary

Comparative study between dynamic hip screw (DHS) with trochanteric stabilizing plate (TSP) and proximal femur locking plate in patients with unstable trochanteric fractures; regarding radiological and functional outcomes / Amr Ahmed Hosny ; Supervised Ibrahem Elgeady , Fady Kamal Beder

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Amr Ahmed Hosny , 2019Description: 128 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • دراسة مقارنة لتثبيت الكسور الغير مستقرة بالجزء العلوي من عظمة الفخذ بواسطة مسمار الفخذ الديناميكي مزودا بشريحة تثبيت المدور الاكبر بشريحة اعلي الفخذ المغلقة من حيث المردود الاشعي والوظيفي [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Orthopedic Surgery Summary: Background: Pertrochanteric fracture of the femur is one of the most common injuries presenting in the causality. Stable pertrochanteric fractures can be managed successfully with conventional implants, such as sliding hip screws or cephalomedullary nails. However, the treatment of unstable trochanteric femur fractures is being challenging with a high rate of implant failure and re-operation.Lateral wall fracture, medialization and varus collapse of the femoral shaft are the most common intra and postoperative complications reported in association with these fractures. The aim of this study is to compare between DHS with trochanteric stabilizing plate (TSP) and proximal femur locking plate (PFLP) in unstable trochanteric fractures regarding the functional and radiological outcomes. Materials and methods: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted whichinvolved40 patients (22 males, 18 females) with unstable trochanteric fractures managed byDHS with TSP and PFLP. The cases were randomized into 2 groups; the first one included cases managed by DHS with TSP while the second group included cases managed by PFLP.The mean age in the study group was 62.72 years. All patients were followed up prospectively for a minimum of 6 months. Patients were assessed clinically using Harris hip score (HHS) at 3 and 6 months and radiographically
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.25.M.Sc.2019.Am.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110079609000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.25.M.Sc.2019.Am.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 79609.CD Not for loan 01020110079609000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Orthopedic Surgery

Background: Pertrochanteric fracture of the femur is one of the most common injuries presenting in the causality. Stable pertrochanteric fractures can be managed successfully with conventional implants, such as sliding hip screws or cephalomedullary nails. However, the treatment of unstable trochanteric femur fractures is being challenging with a high rate of implant failure and re-operation.Lateral wall fracture, medialization and varus collapse of the femoral shaft are the most common intra and postoperative complications reported in association with these fractures. The aim of this study is to compare between DHS with trochanteric stabilizing plate (TSP) and proximal femur locking plate (PFLP) in unstable trochanteric fractures regarding the functional and radiological outcomes. Materials and methods: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted whichinvolved40 patients (22 males, 18 females) with unstable trochanteric fractures managed byDHS with TSP and PFLP. The cases were randomized into 2 groups; the first one included cases managed by DHS with TSP while the second group included cases managed by PFLP.The mean age in the study group was 62.72 years. All patients were followed up prospectively for a minimum of 6 months. Patients were assessed clinically using Harris hip score (HHS) at 3 and 6 months and radiographically

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.