header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with diabetes treated with insulin alone and insulin with metformin / Usama Ahmed Elsaeed Salem ; Supervised Reda Ismail Riad , Ahmed Taher , Mahmoud Elnokeety

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Usama Ahmed Elsaeed Salem , 2019Description: 150 P. ; 25cmOther title:
  • متحصلات الحمل فى النساء الحوامل مرضى السكرى المعالجين بالإنسولين فقط و الإنسولين مع الميتفورمين [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Summary: Aim: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant diabetic women treated with either insulin and metformin or insulin only. Methods: 220 pregnant diabetic women with type 1, 2 or gestational diabetes were randomisely assigned into two groups .each group is 110 pregnant diabetic women. One group takes insulin and metformin treatment to achieve glycemic targets and other take insulin only treatment. Pregnancy outcomes in the 110 women who remained exclusively on insulin were compared with 110 pregnant diabetic women treated with insulin and metformin matched for age, weight and ethnicity. Results: There were no significant differences in baseline maternal risk factors. Group {u2161} had significantly greater mean weight gain from enrolment to term (5.9 vs. 4.3 kg; P < 0.000). There was no difference between group {u2160} and group {u2161}, respectively, comparing gestational hypertension (14.5 vs. 19.1%, P = 0.367), pre-eclampsia (7.27 vs. 9,09%, P = 0.622),insulin dosage was decreased in group {u2160} statistically significant (mean 39.5±16.5 vs. 55.4±17.5 units, P = 0.000), vaginal delivery (41.8 vs. 47.3%, P = 0.416) or rate of elective Caesarean section (39.1 vs. 32.7%, P = 0.325) rate of emergency caesarean section (19.1 vs. 20%, P=0.865) ,perinatal loss 4 cases in group {u2161} vs. 3 case in group {u2160}. Neonatal morbidity was improved in group {u2160}; prematurity (16.63 vs. 24.55%, P = 0.417), neonatal hypoglycemia (7.3 vs. 24.5 %, P= 0.000), respiratory distress (13.64 vs. 30 %, P= 0.003), neonatal jaundice (13.6 vs. 33.6%, P < 0.000) and admission to neonatal unit (24.55 vs. 35.45%, P = 0.077). The incidence of macrosomia (birth weight centile > 90) was significantly different [group {u2160} (16.4%) vs. group {u2161} 29.1%; P = 0.024
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.15.Ph.D.2019.Us.P (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110079710000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.15.Ph.D.2019.Us.P (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 79710.CD Not for loan 01020110079710000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Aim: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant diabetic women treated with either insulin and metformin or insulin only. Methods: 220 pregnant diabetic women with type 1, 2 or gestational diabetes were randomisely assigned into two groups .each group is 110 pregnant diabetic women. One group takes insulin and metformin treatment to achieve glycemic targets and other take insulin only treatment. Pregnancy outcomes in the 110 women who remained exclusively on insulin were compared with 110 pregnant diabetic women treated with insulin and metformin matched for age, weight and ethnicity. Results: There were no significant differences in baseline maternal risk factors. Group {u2161} had significantly greater mean weight gain from enrolment to term (5.9 vs. 4.3 kg; P < 0.000). There was no difference between group {u2160} and group {u2161}, respectively, comparing gestational hypertension (14.5 vs. 19.1%, P = 0.367), pre-eclampsia (7.27 vs. 9,09%, P = 0.622),insulin dosage was decreased in group {u2160} statistically significant (mean 39.5±16.5 vs. 55.4±17.5 units, P = 0.000), vaginal delivery (41.8 vs. 47.3%, P = 0.416) or rate of elective Caesarean section (39.1 vs. 32.7%, P = 0.325) rate of emergency caesarean section (19.1 vs. 20%, P=0.865) ,perinatal loss 4 cases in group {u2161} vs. 3 case in group {u2160}. Neonatal morbidity was improved in group {u2160}; prematurity (16.63 vs. 24.55%, P = 0.417), neonatal hypoglycemia (7.3 vs. 24.5 %, P= 0.000), respiratory distress (13.64 vs. 30 %, P= 0.003), neonatal jaundice (13.6 vs. 33.6%, P < 0.000) and admission to neonatal unit (24.55 vs. 35.45%, P = 0.077). The incidence of macrosomia (birth weight centile > 90) was significantly different [group {u2160} (16.4%) vs. group {u2161} 29.1%; P = 0.024

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image