header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

New integrated exercise program versus bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis / Mahmoud Ibrahim Elsayed ; Supervised Fatma Sedik Amin , Aliaa Attyah Mohamed Diab , Mohammad A. Negm

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Mahmoud Ibrahim Elsayed , 2019Description: 131 P. : charts , facsimiles , photographs ; 25cmOther title:
  • برنامج التمارين المتكاملة الجديد مقابل الدعامة الظهرية فى الجنف مجهول السبب للمراهقين [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science Summary: Background: Idiopathic scoliosis is the most common structural spinal deformity in children and adolescents that affects about 2{u2013}3% of the population. Early identification and intervention has been shown to prevent the need for surgery by halting or slowing the progression of structural scoliotic curve. The Purpose of this study is to compare between the effect of integrated exercise program and bracing on Cobb{u2019}s angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Subjects: Sixty subjects with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (54 females, 6 males), was divided into 2 equal groups. Group A consists of 30 subjects mean age (14.6±1.07SD) years, height (1.52± 0.07) meters, mean weight (50.27± 5) kilograms; received the integrated exercises program for 6 months. The integrated exercises program consists of Schroth, Core stability, Yoga, Pilates exercises and Myofascial release. Group B consists of 30 subjects mean age (15.1±1.16) years, mean height (1.53±0.05) meters, mean weight (52.23±2.73) kilograms; used Boston Brace for 6 months. Cobb{u2019}s angle was measured before and after treatment. Results: the mean of Cobb{u2019}s angle in Group A before intervention (35.2±3.03) and after intervention (33.2±2.86) and in Group B before intervention (34.7±2.76) and after intervention (35.5±2.56) while the p value (between groups) in Group A before and after intervention was (0.000), in Group B before and after intervention was (0.006)
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.09.Ph.D.2019.Ma.N (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110079815000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.09.Ph.D.2019.Ma.N (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 79815.CD Not for loan 01020110079815000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science

Background: Idiopathic scoliosis is the most common structural spinal deformity in children and adolescents that affects about 2{u2013}3% of the population. Early identification and intervention has been shown to prevent the need for surgery by halting or slowing the progression of structural scoliotic curve. The Purpose of this study is to compare between the effect of integrated exercise program and bracing on Cobb{u2019}s angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Subjects: Sixty subjects with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (54 females, 6 males), was divided into 2 equal groups. Group A consists of 30 subjects mean age (14.6±1.07SD) years, height (1.52± 0.07) meters, mean weight (50.27± 5) kilograms; received the integrated exercises program for 6 months. The integrated exercises program consists of Schroth, Core stability, Yoga, Pilates exercises and Myofascial release. Group B consists of 30 subjects mean age (15.1±1.16) years, mean height (1.53±0.05) meters, mean weight (52.23±2.73) kilograms; used Boston Brace for 6 months. Cobb{u2019}s angle was measured before and after treatment. Results: the mean of Cobb{u2019}s angle in Group A before intervention (35.2±3.03) and after intervention (33.2±2.86) and in Group B before intervention (34.7±2.76) and after intervention (35.5±2.56) while the p value (between groups) in Group A before and after intervention was (0.000), in Group B before and after intervention was (0.006)

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image