header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Diclofenac sodium phonophoresis versus conventional therapeutic ultrasound on knee osteoarthritis / Ashraf Mokhtar Sowilam Aboelkhair ; Supervised Wadida H. Elsayed , Molham M. Mohammad , Hamada E. S. Hassan

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Ashraf Mokhtar Sowilam Aboelkhair , 2019Description: 94 P. : charts , facsimiles , photoghraphs ; 25cmOther title:
  • مادة ديكلوفيناك الصوديوم المدخلة بواسطة الموجات فوق الصوتية مقارنة مقابل الموجات الصوتية فى علاج مرضى إلتهابات مفصل الركبة [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical therapy - Department of Basic Science Summary: Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent degenerative joint disease that impacts people{u2019}s quality of life and puts a burden on health care costs. Purpose: to compare the effectiveness of diclofenac sodium phonophoresis (DSPH) with conventional therapeutic ultrasound (TUS) on knee OA. Subjects and methods: Fifty patients (two groups) had participated in this study. Group (A); consists of 25 patients (5 males, 20 females), with mean age 57 years, treated with TUS for 5 min. plus exercises. Group (B); consists of 25 patients (8 males, 17 females), with mean age 54 years, treated with DSPH for 5 min. plus exercises. Each patient was assessed for knee pain intensity level and physical function using WOMAC index and knee flexion ROM using digital inclinometer pretreatment, posttreatment and follow up one month after treatment. Results: There were non-significant difference in WOMAC score among group (A), and significant difference between pre and posttreatment and between pretreatment and follow up in WOMAC score among group (B) (P- value <0.003*). Significant difference between pretreatment and posttreatment and between posttreatment and follow up in knee flexion ROM (P- value <0.03*) among group (A) and significant only between pre and posttreatment in knee flexion ROM(P- value = 0.000*) among group (B). There were non-significant difference between group (A) and (B) neither at posttreatment nor at follow up in WOMAC score or in knee flexion ROM
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.09.M.Sc.2019.As.D (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110080078000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.09.M.Sc.2019.As.D (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 80078.CD Not for loan 01020110080078000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical therapy - Department of Basic Science

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent degenerative joint disease that impacts people{u2019}s quality of life and puts a burden on health care costs. Purpose: to compare the effectiveness of diclofenac sodium phonophoresis (DSPH) with conventional therapeutic ultrasound (TUS) on knee OA. Subjects and methods: Fifty patients (two groups) had participated in this study. Group (A); consists of 25 patients (5 males, 20 females), with mean age 57 years, treated with TUS for 5 min. plus exercises. Group (B); consists of 25 patients (8 males, 17 females), with mean age 54 years, treated with DSPH for 5 min. plus exercises. Each patient was assessed for knee pain intensity level and physical function using WOMAC index and knee flexion ROM using digital inclinometer pretreatment, posttreatment and follow up one month after treatment. Results: There were non-significant difference in WOMAC score among group (A), and significant difference between pre and posttreatment and between pretreatment and follow up in WOMAC score among group (B) (P- value <0.003*). Significant difference between pretreatment and posttreatment and between posttreatment and follow up in knee flexion ROM (P- value <0.03*) among group (A) and significant only between pre and posttreatment in knee flexion ROM(P- value = 0.000*) among group (B). There were non-significant difference between group (A) and (B) neither at posttreatment nor at follow up in WOMAC score or in knee flexion ROM

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image