header
Image from OpenLibrary

Postoperative pain after root canal treatment using manual or rotary protaper system : A randomized clinical trial : (part 7) / Samar Ahmed Mohamed Mosaad ; Supervised Suzan Abdulwanees Amin , Heba Ahmed Alasfory

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Samar Ahmed Mohamed Mosaad , 2017Description: 91 P. : charts ; 25cmOther title:
  • ألم ما بعد علاج الجذور بإستخدام نظام البروتابر اليدوى أو الدوارة : تجربة إكلينيكية بالانتقاء العشوائي : الجزء السابع [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Endodontics Summary: Objective: This study compared the postoperative pain after the use of manual and rotary instrumentation of the same instrument design, namely ProTaper Universal system (Dentsply Maillefer ,Tulsa Dental, TN, USA) in mandibular posterior teeth after single root canal treatment, in a randomized clinical trial. Participants and Methods: Forty-six participants with vital or non-vital, mandibular posterior teeth without periapical pathosis, were endodontically treated in single visit. The patients were equally allocated at random into two groups. The instrumentation was done according to manufacturer instructions using either manual ProTaper files for (group M) or rotary ProTaper files for (group R). Irrigation was done using 2.6% NaOCl and 17% EDTA, canals were obturated using gutta-percha and resin sealer by active lateral compaction technique. Pain scoring was done using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) preoperatively then after 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 7 days postoperatively. Pain levels were assigned to one of four categories, None, Mild, Moderate or Severe.Statistical analysis was done by Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) vs. 21, P-values < 0.05 were considered significantsults in a lower incidence and a shorter duration of postoperative pain than manual instrumentation
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2017.Sa.P (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110080514000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2017.Sa.P (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 80514.CD Not for loan 01020110080514000
Browsing المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2017.Re.A The adaptation and bioactivity of endosequence BC, biodentine and AH plus endodontic sealer{u200E} : An in vitro study / Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2017.Sa.A Anesthetic efficacy of 2% mepivacaine versus 4% articaine for inferior Alveolar nerve blocks in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars : A randomized clinical trial Therapeutic study (manbip) part / Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2017.Sa.A Anesthetic efficacy of 2% mepivacaine versus 4% articaine for inferior Alveolar nerve blocks in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars : A randomized clinical trial Therapeutic study (manbip) part / Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2017.Sa.P Postoperative pain after root canal treatment using manual or rotary protaper system : A randomized clinical trial : (part 7) / Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2017.Sa.P Postoperative pain after root canal treatment using manual or rotary protaper system : A randomized clinical trial : (part 7) / Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2017.So.A Anesthetic efficacy of 2% mepivacaine versus 4% articaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars : A randomized clinical trial - Part 11 / Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2017.So.A Anesthetic efficacy of 2% mepivacaine versus 4% articaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars : A randomized clinical trial - Part 11 /

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Endodontics

Objective: This study compared the postoperative pain after the use of manual and rotary instrumentation of the same instrument design, namely ProTaper Universal system (Dentsply Maillefer ,Tulsa Dental, TN, USA) in mandibular posterior teeth after single root canal treatment, in a randomized clinical trial. Participants and Methods: Forty-six participants with vital or non-vital, mandibular posterior teeth without periapical pathosis, were endodontically treated in single visit. The patients were equally allocated at random into two groups. The instrumentation was done according to manufacturer instructions using either manual ProTaper files for (group M) or rotary ProTaper files for (group R). Irrigation was done using 2.6% NaOCl and 17% EDTA, canals were obturated using gutta-percha and resin sealer by active lateral compaction technique. Pain scoring was done using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) preoperatively then after 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 7 days postoperatively. Pain levels were assigned to one of four categories, None, Mild, Moderate or Severe.Statistical analysis was done by Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) vs. 21, P-values < 0.05 were considered significantsults in a lower incidence and a shorter duration of postoperative pain than manual instrumentation

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.