header
Image from OpenLibrary

The use of N1-P2 cortical auditory evoked potential in hearing threshold detection in adults with normal hearing and hearing loss / Shimaa Fekry Nabieh Mohammed ; Supervised Abeir Osman Dabbous , Amira Maged Elshennawy , Mona Mohamed Hamdy

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Shimaa Fekry Nabieh Mohammed , 2019Description: 159 P. : charts , facimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • استخدام موجات الجهد المثار السمعى "إن 1- بى2" المثار من القشرة السمعية المخية فى الكشف على مستوى السمع فى الأشخاص البالغين ذوى حاسة سمع طبيعية و الذين يعانون من فقدان السمع [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of E.N.T Summary: Background: Various auditory evoked potential techniques have been used as means of objective estimation of the behavioural audiogram in subjects who cannot provide reliable or accurate behavioural results. Objectives: To assess the ability of the N1-P2 cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) to estimate the hearing threshold level at different frequencies, in normal hearing adults and adults with different degrees of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL); and to compare it to the auditory steady state response (ASSR). Methods: This study included 90 subjects (180 ears), grouped according to the degree of hearing obtained by pure tone audiometry (PTA), into 6 groups. Hearing threshold was then measured with using N1P2 and ASSR. Results:N1P2 and ASSR were highly correlated to PTA at all frequencies. However, CAEP predicted the behavioral thresholds more accurately than ASSR at all frequencies especially at 500& 1000Hz in the normal hearing group and in in all degrees of SNHL. N1P2 was equally accurate in all frequencies and predicted the behavioral thresholds better at more severe degrees of SNHL at 1, 2 &4 kHz. ASSR was closer to PTA at 2000Hz than other frequencies in all groups. Conclusion: BothN1P2 CAEP and the ASSR can be reliably used as objective methods in estimating the behavioral hearing thresholds, with the N1P2 yielding more accurate results than the ASSR especially at lower frequencies and at more severe degrees of hearing loss. So, we recommend using these tests, and preferably the N1P2, in estimating the behavioral threshold in difficult to test adults
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.12.Ph.D.2019.Sh.U (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110080898000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.12.Ph.D.2019.Sh.U (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 80898.CD Not for loan 01020110080898000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of E.N.T

Background: Various auditory evoked potential techniques have been used as means of objective estimation of the behavioural audiogram in subjects who cannot provide reliable or accurate behavioural results. Objectives: To assess the ability of the N1-P2 cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) to estimate the hearing threshold level at different frequencies, in normal hearing adults and adults with different degrees of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL); and to compare it to the auditory steady state response (ASSR). Methods: This study included 90 subjects (180 ears), grouped according to the degree of hearing obtained by pure tone audiometry (PTA), into 6 groups. Hearing threshold was then measured with using N1P2 and ASSR. Results:N1P2 and ASSR were highly correlated to PTA at all frequencies. However, CAEP predicted the behavioral thresholds more accurately than ASSR at all frequencies especially at 500& 1000Hz in the normal hearing group and in in all degrees of SNHL. N1P2 was equally accurate in all frequencies and predicted the behavioral thresholds better at more severe degrees of SNHL at 1, 2 &4 kHz. ASSR was closer to PTA at 2000Hz than other frequencies in all groups. Conclusion: BothN1P2 CAEP and the ASSR can be reliably used as objective methods in estimating the behavioral hearing thresholds, with the N1P2 yielding more accurate results than the ASSR especially at lower frequencies and at more severe degrees of hearing loss. So, we recommend using these tests, and preferably the N1P2, in estimating the behavioral threshold in difficult to test adults

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.