header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Effect of cervical posture correction and lumbar stabilization exerciseson mechanical low back pain / Aliaa Mohamed Ali Elabd ; Supervised Haytham Mohamed Elhafez , Ahmed Ibrahim Elerian , Salah Eldin Bassit

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Aliaa Mohamed Ali Elabd , 2020Description: 152 P. : charts , facsimiles , photoghrphs ; 25cmOther title:
  • تأثير تمرينات تصحيح القوام العنقية وتمرينات الثبات القطنية على آلام أسفل الظهر الميكانيكية [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science Summary: Background: Although current lumbar stabilization exercises are beneficial for mechanical low back pain, further research is recommended focusing on normalizing global sagittal spinal alignment. Purpose: This study was conducted to examine the effects of adding cervical posture correction to lumbar stabilization exercises on mechanical low back pain. Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. Fifty adult patients of both genders with chronic mechanical low back pain and forward head posture were assigned into one of two groups to receive three sessions/ week for 12 weeks treatment; group A: cervical posture correction and lumbar stabilization, and group B (control): lumbar stabilization. The primary outcome was back pain intensity level. Secondary outcomes included disability, craniovertebral angle, lumbopelvic alignment parameters (lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence), and sagittal lumbar intervertebral movements (translation and rotation). They were measured from lateral views X-ray. Reported data were analyzed by Two-ways-MANOVA. Results: MANOVA indicates significant effects. Pain, disability, lumbar lordosis, and sacral slope were significantly reduced in group A more than B (p< 0.05). Craniovertebral angle and pelvic tilt were increased in A more than B (p< 0.05). However, pelvic incidence and all other intervertebral movements revealed no significant differences (p>0.05). Within-group-comparisons were significant for all variables in both groups except for pelvic incidence
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.09.Ph.D.2020.Al.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110081439000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.09.Ph.D.2020.Al.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 81439.CD Not for loan 01020110081439000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science

Background: Although current lumbar stabilization exercises are beneficial for mechanical low back pain, further research is recommended focusing on normalizing global sagittal spinal alignment. Purpose: This study was conducted to examine the effects of adding cervical posture correction to lumbar stabilization exercises on mechanical low back pain. Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. Fifty adult patients of both genders with chronic mechanical low back pain and forward head posture were assigned into one of two groups to receive three sessions/ week for 12 weeks treatment; group A: cervical posture correction and lumbar stabilization, and group B (control): lumbar stabilization. The primary outcome was back pain intensity level. Secondary outcomes included disability, craniovertebral angle, lumbopelvic alignment parameters (lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence), and sagittal lumbar intervertebral movements (translation and rotation). They were measured from lateral views X-ray. Reported data were analyzed by Two-ways-MANOVA. Results: MANOVA indicates significant effects. Pain, disability, lumbar lordosis, and sacral slope were significantly reduced in group A more than B (p< 0.05). Craniovertebral angle and pelvic tilt were increased in A more than B (p< 0.05). However, pelvic incidence and all other intervertebral movements revealed no significant differences (p>0.05). Within-group-comparisons were significant for all variables in both groups except for pelvic incidence

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image