header
Image from OpenLibrary

Effect of foot orthosis and physical therapy on patellofemoral pain syndrome : A systematic review / Marihan Zakaria Aziz Makary ; Supervised Salwa Fadle Abdelmageed , Karima Abdalaty Hassan

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Marihan Zakaria Aziz Makary , 2020Description: 127 P . : charts , photographs ; 25cmOther title:
  • دراسة منهجية : تأثير جبيرة القدم والعلاج الطبيعى متلازمة آلم الرضفة وأسفل عظمة الفخذ [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Musculoskeletal Disorders Summary: Background Although foot orthosis may play a role in patellofemoral pain syndrome, its significance is still conflicting and previous studies are low evidence level. Objective To assess the latest evidence regarding the effectiveness of foot orthosis (FO) on adult patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). Methods A comprehensive electronic database search of PubMed, Cochrane Library Database, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (Pedro), ProQuest, EBSCo host, and Ovid databases was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the English language since January 2000 till February 2019 on an adult with patellofemoral pain syndrome treated by foot orthosis and physical therapy, with hand searching to reference lists of previous systematic reviews and included papers. At least one primary outcome measure for pain or function must have been reported. Two authors independently reviewed and assessed each citation for inclusion, The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to rate methodological quality and risk of bias. Data was met analyzed when this was not possible, qualitative data analysis was performed. Results A total of nine RCTs with a total number of 914 patients (6 on non- runners and 3 on runners) were included. the findings were summarized in four main comparisons as follows 1)foot orthosis versus flat insoles these results showed the positive efficacy of FO on pain, function and muscular activity, 2) foot orthoses alone versus physiotherapy have a poor indication of PFO alone as an intervention alternative to physiotherapy for PFPS, 3)foot orthoses versus no treatment may provide greater improvements on pain, function and neuromotor changes than natural history concerning foot posture, and 4)foot orthoses combined physiotherapy is better than physiotherapy alone even though the success may relate to clinical foot predictors for foot orthosis
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.03.Ph.D.2020.Ma.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110081814000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.03.Ph.D.2020.Ma.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 81814.CD Not for loan 01020110081814000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Musculoskeletal Disorders

Background Although foot orthosis may play a role in patellofemoral pain syndrome, its significance is still conflicting and previous studies are low evidence level. Objective To assess the latest evidence regarding the effectiveness of foot orthosis (FO) on adult patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). Methods A comprehensive electronic database search of PubMed, Cochrane Library Database, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (Pedro), ProQuest, EBSCo host, and Ovid databases was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the English language since January 2000 till February 2019 on an adult with patellofemoral pain syndrome treated by foot orthosis and physical therapy, with hand searching to reference lists of previous systematic reviews and included papers. At least one primary outcome measure for pain or function must have been reported. Two authors independently reviewed and assessed each citation for inclusion, The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to rate methodological quality and risk of bias. Data was met analyzed when this was not possible, qualitative data analysis was performed. Results A total of nine RCTs with a total number of 914 patients (6 on non- runners and 3 on runners) were included. the findings were summarized in four main comparisons as follows 1)foot orthosis versus flat insoles these results showed the positive efficacy of FO on pain, function and muscular activity, 2) foot orthoses alone versus physiotherapy have a poor indication of PFO alone as an intervention alternative to physiotherapy for PFPS, 3)foot orthoses versus no treatment may provide greater improvements on pain, function and neuromotor changes than natural history concerning foot posture, and 4)foot orthoses combined physiotherapy is better than physiotherapy alone even though the success may relate to clinical foot predictors for foot orthosis

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.