header
Image from OpenLibrary

Effect of manipultaive physical therapy on nerve root functions in discogenic lumbosacral radiculopathy patients / Mohamed Badr Mohamed Hassanein ; Supervised Eman Samir Mohamed Fayez , Khaled Ahmed Fawaz , Mohamed Abdelhakeim Kasem

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Mohamed Badr Mohamed Hassanein , 2020Description: 92 P. : charts , facimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • تاثير العلاج الطبيعى اليدوى على وظائف الجذر العصبى فى مرضى اعتلال الجذور القطنيه الناتج عن الانزلاق الغضروفى [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Neuromuscular and NeuroSurgery Summary: Background: Lumbosacral radiculopathy (LSR) is a common clinical problem that involves L5 and S1 nerve roots and often results in persistent disability. The use of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) for patients with symptomatic lumbar disc disease has been suggested for the management of lumbosacral radiculopathy. Purpose: to investigate the effect of manipulative physical therapy on pain and nerve root function. Methods: Fourteen discogenic lumbosacral radiculopathy patients from both sexes participated in this study. They randomly assigned into 2 equal groups. Group A (Experimental): every patient received 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks consisted of 20 minute side posture positioning, rotatory mobilization and rotatory manipulation of lumbar spine, neurodynamic mobilization, and core stability. Group B (control): received program as Group A without neurodynamic mobilization. All patients assessed for back pain by Visual analogue scale (VAS), Disability by Oswestry disability index, and for soleus H-reflex amplitude (symptomatic, asymptomatic sides, and ratio between) by surface EMG unit, and fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity (MD) & Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (symptomatic & asymptomatic sides) by MRI. Results: There was significant improvement post treatment within both groups for all dependent variables in the symptomatic side except MD & ADC, but none in the asymptomatic side. Independent t-test revealed non-significant differences in any dependent variable (but ADC symptomatic post-score was more similar to asymptomatic pre-score in group A, than group B, that had a trend toward significance, P-value=0.1)
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.08.M.Sc.2020.Mo.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110081880000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.08.M.Sc.2020.Mo.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 81880.CD Not for loan 01020110081880000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Neuromuscular and NeuroSurgery

Background: Lumbosacral radiculopathy (LSR) is a common clinical problem that involves L5 and S1 nerve roots and often results in persistent disability. The use of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) for patients with symptomatic lumbar disc disease has been suggested for the management of lumbosacral radiculopathy. Purpose: to investigate the effect of manipulative physical therapy on pain and nerve root function. Methods: Fourteen discogenic lumbosacral radiculopathy patients from both sexes participated in this study. They randomly assigned into 2 equal groups. Group A (Experimental): every patient received 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks consisted of 20 minute side posture positioning, rotatory mobilization and rotatory manipulation of lumbar spine, neurodynamic mobilization, and core stability. Group B (control): received program as Group A without neurodynamic mobilization. All patients assessed for back pain by Visual analogue scale (VAS), Disability by Oswestry disability index, and for soleus H-reflex amplitude (symptomatic, asymptomatic sides, and ratio between) by surface EMG unit, and fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity (MD) & Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (symptomatic & asymptomatic sides) by MRI. Results: There was significant improvement post treatment within both groups for all dependent variables in the symptomatic side except MD & ADC, but none in the asymptomatic side. Independent t-test revealed non-significant differences in any dependent variable (but ADC symptomatic post-score was more similar to asymptomatic pre-score in group A, than group B, that had a trend toward significance, P-value=0.1)

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.