header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Neural mobilization versus myofascial release to stabilization exercises after lumbar spine fusion : A randomized controlled trial / Mohamed Elsayed MohamedAli Helal ; Supervised Mohsen Mohamed Elsayyad , Nabil Mahmoud Ismail Abdel Aal , Hassan Hussein Ahmed

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Mohamed Elsayed MohamedAli Helal , 2020Description: 105 P . : charts , facsmilies ; 25cmOther title:
  • تجربة عشوائية محكمة : تقنية تحريك العصب مقابل الانفراج العضلى الليفى إلى تمارين التثبيت مابعد جراحة تثبيت الفقرات القطنية [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science Summary: Background and Objectives: To investigate the effect of adding neural mobilization versus myofascial release to stabilization exercises on disability, pain, and lumbar range of motion in patients with lumbar spine fusion. Materials and Methods: The study design is a parallel-groups, randomized controlled trial. Sixty patients who have undergone lumbar spine fusion were randomly divided into three equal groups. Group (I) received neural mobilization and stabilization exercises, group (II) received myofascial release and stabilization exercises, and group (III) received stabilization exercises only. Each group received three sessions per week for four weeks. Disability, pain, and back range of motion were assessed using Oswestry disability index, visual analogue scale and back range of motion device respectively, before starting treatment, after finishing treatment and one month later as a follow up. Results: Statistically significant differences were found among the groups regarding disability and pain (P<0.05) in favor of neural mobilization group, but there were no statistically significant differences among groups regarding lumbar range of motion (P>0.05). Regarding the within-group effect, there were statistically significant differences in all outcome measures after 1 month of treatment, as well as, after 1 month of follow up in each group(P<0.05). Conclusion: Patients who received neural mobilization or myofascial release combined with stabilization exercises had better improvement, in favor of the neural mobilization group, regarding disability and pain than patients who received stabilization exercises alone after lumbar spine fusion. No differences were found among the groups regarding lumbar range of motion
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.09.M.Sc.2020.Mo.N (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110082174000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.09.M.Sc.2020.Mo.N (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 82174.CD Not for loan 01020110082174000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science

Background and Objectives: To investigate the effect of adding neural mobilization versus myofascial release to stabilization exercises on disability, pain, and lumbar range of motion in patients with lumbar spine fusion. Materials and Methods: The study design is a parallel-groups, randomized controlled trial. Sixty patients who have undergone lumbar spine fusion were randomly divided into three equal groups. Group (I) received neural mobilization and stabilization exercises, group (II) received myofascial release and stabilization exercises, and group (III) received stabilization exercises only. Each group received three sessions per week for four weeks. Disability, pain, and back range of motion were assessed using Oswestry disability index, visual analogue scale and back range of motion device respectively, before starting treatment, after finishing treatment and one month later as a follow up. Results: Statistically significant differences were found among the groups regarding disability and pain (P<0.05) in favor of neural mobilization group, but there were no statistically significant differences among groups regarding lumbar range of motion (P>0.05). Regarding the within-group effect, there were statistically significant differences in all outcome measures after 1 month of treatment, as well as, after 1 month of follow up in each group(P<0.05). Conclusion: Patients who received neural mobilization or myofascial release combined with stabilization exercises had better improvement, in favor of the neural mobilization group, regarding disability and pain than patients who received stabilization exercises alone after lumbar spine fusion. No differences were found among the groups regarding lumbar range of motion

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image