header
Image from OpenLibrary

Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of staphylococcus aureus isolates showing mupirocin resistance / Mennatollah Said Abdelkarim Ahmed ; Supervised Nagwa Abdelhamid Tharwat , Sherif. M. Elnagdy , Doaa M. Ghaith

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Mennatollah Said Abdelkarim Ahmed , 2020Description: 100 P. : charts , facimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • التى تظهر مقاومة للميوبيروسين Staphylococcus aureus التوصيف المظهرى والجينى لعزلات البكتريا العنقودية الذهبية [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Science - Department of Botany and Microbiology Summary: Background and objective: Fusidic acid is widely used as a topical treatment of wound and skin infections. Resistance of S. aureus to fusidic acid may be due to expression of a protein encoded by fusB, fusC or fusD genes causing alternation of the drug target. We aimed in our study to determine the prevalence of fusidic acid resistance among methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from wound and skin infections and to access the expression of fusB, fusC and fusD genes by real time PCR. Materials and Methods: From total 412 S. aureus unrepeated clinical isolates recovered from wound and skin infections in Cairo University hospital; 250 (60.7%) were MRSA isolates. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing by disc diffusion method were done according to clinical laboratory institute guidelines (CLSI) and confirmed by Vitek 2 compact system. Real time PCR was done to access expression of fusB, fusC and fusD genes. Results: Among 250 MRSA clinical isolates antibiotics resistance profile were as follows; ciprofloxacin (76.8%), ofloxacin (69.2%), clindamycin (67.6%), gentamicin (50.8%), doxycycline (46.8%), erythromycin (43.6%), rifampicin (24.8%), levofloxacin (24.4%), amikacin (24%), linezolid (1.6%), mupirocin (0.0%) teicoplanin (0.0%), and vancomycin (0.0%). Fusidic acid resistance was detected in 50 isolates (20%).The most common resistance determinant was fusC gene which was found in 14/50 (28%) of all resistant isolates, whereas XI fusB and fusD genes were not detected. Conclusion: Given the fact that data are rare on the prevalence of fusidic acid resistance we found that 20% of MRSA clinical isolates exhibited resistance to fusidic acid because of carriage of the fusC determinant; yet maintained susceptibility to mupirocin (100%) which can be an alternative therapeutic option in wound and skin infections
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.12.05.M.Sc.2020.Me.P (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110082639000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.12.05.M.Sc.2020.Me.P (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 82639.CD Not for loan 01020110082639000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Science - Department of Botany and Microbiology

Background and objective: Fusidic acid is widely used as a topical treatment of wound and skin infections. Resistance of S. aureus to fusidic acid may be due to expression of a protein encoded by fusB, fusC or fusD genes causing alternation of the drug target. We aimed in our study to determine the prevalence of fusidic acid resistance among methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from wound and skin infections and to access the expression of fusB, fusC and fusD genes by real time PCR. Materials and Methods: From total 412 S. aureus unrepeated clinical isolates recovered from wound and skin infections in Cairo University hospital; 250 (60.7%) were MRSA isolates. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing by disc diffusion method were done according to clinical laboratory institute guidelines (CLSI) and confirmed by Vitek 2 compact system. Real time PCR was done to access expression of fusB, fusC and fusD genes. Results: Among 250 MRSA clinical isolates antibiotics resistance profile were as follows; ciprofloxacin (76.8%), ofloxacin (69.2%), clindamycin (67.6%), gentamicin (50.8%), doxycycline (46.8%), erythromycin (43.6%), rifampicin (24.8%), levofloxacin (24.4%), amikacin (24%), linezolid (1.6%), mupirocin (0.0%) teicoplanin (0.0%), and vancomycin (0.0%). Fusidic acid resistance was detected in 50 isolates (20%).The most common resistance determinant was fusC gene which was found in 14/50 (28%) of all resistant isolates, whereas XI fusB and fusD genes were not detected. Conclusion: Given the fact that data are rare on the prevalence of fusidic acid resistance we found that 20% of MRSA clinical isolates exhibited resistance to fusidic acid because of carriage of the fusC determinant; yet maintained susceptibility to mupirocin (100%) which can be an alternative therapeutic option in wound and skin infections

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.