Infra-zygomatic mini implant supported appliance for distalization and intrusion of maxillary dentition compared to headgear in growing patients : A randomized clinical trial / Ahmed Khaled Afify ; Supervised Amr Emad Eldakroury , Mostafa Mohamed Eldawlatly , Sherif Ali Elkordy
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/617d1/617d1ff548fa5b7c4c2f0f011c0e0828846e60e2" alt="Text"
- جهاز يعتمد على زرعات صغيرة مثبتة فى العظم الوجنى السفلى لرفع الفك العلوى و سحبه للخلف فى المرضى اليافعين مقارنة بغطاء الرأس : تجربة سريرية عشوائية [Added title page title]
- Issued also as CD
Item type | Current library | Home library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.09.06.M.Sc.2020.Ah.I (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not for loan | 01010110082823000 | ||
![]() |
مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.09.06.M.Sc.2020.Ah.I (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 82823.CD | Not for loan | 01020110082823000 |
Browsing المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine- Department of Orthodontics
Aim: To evaluate the dentoalveolar and skeletal effect of a new Infra-zygomatic Mini implant supported appliance and compare it with high pull headgear appliance in treatment of growing patients with class II malocclusion. Methodology: 22 growing boys aged between (10 to 12 years) with class II div 1 malocclusion randomly divided to 2 equal groups. The first group treated with high pull headgear with acrylic splint and the second one treated with a new Infra-zygomatic Mini implant supported appliance. The treatment duration was 8 months for both groups. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after the treatment for each patient to be analyzed. Results: The first molar distalization was 2.58 ± 2.31 mm in head gear group and 1.53 ± 2.83 mm in mini-implants group. SNA and A-S VRL changed by mean (-0.29 ± 1.12 and -1.45 ± 2.19) respectively in the head gear group and by mean (-0.90 ± 0.63 and -0.66 ± 1.44) respectively in the mini-implants group. There were no significant differences between the two groups except in U1-PP, Cen U1-S-VRL,Interincisal angle and Nasolabial angle. Conclusions: the mini-implant supported appliance can be used as the fixed replacement of the removable high pull headgear appliance with no need for patient cooperation
Issued also as CD
There are no comments on this title.