header
Image from OpenLibrary

Patient satisfaction and one-year clinical evaluation of glazed ips empress CAD versus glazed celtra duo ceramic laminate veneers : Randomized controlled clinical trial / Omnia Mohammed Wafik Elmesallamy ; Supervised Mohammed Labib Zamzam , Jylan Fouad Elguindy , Ahmed Soliman Idris

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Omnia Mohammed Wafik Elmesallamy , 2020Description: 130 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • تقويم رضى المريض و تقويم إكلينيكى لمدة عام للوجوه التجميلية المصنعة من أى بى اس امبريس كاد المجلية مقارنة بالوجوه التجميلية المصنعة سيلترا ديو المجلية : تجربة اكلينيكية بالانتقاء العشوائي [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics Summary: Aim:To evaluate fracture resistance and survival rate of IPS Empress CAD versusglazedCeltra Duo ceramic laminate veneers.Methodology:Thirty-six ceramic laminate veneers were fabricated for maxillaryanterior teeth. The patients were divided into two groups according to the materialGroup 1(control group) fabricated from IPS Empress CAD laminate veneers and group2(intervention group) fabricated from glazedCeltra Duo laminate veneers.Standardized the same preparation with butt joint design and chamfer finish linelocated supra gingival were performed for all the teeth.The fabrication of the veneers was performed using Cad\Cam(Ceramill motion)machine, with software (Exocad). The veneers surfaces were treated and silanatedaccording to the manufacture instruction of each ceramic and enamel surfaces wereetched where total etch adhesive protocol was obeyed using BISCO.Fracture resistance, marginal adaptation, retention, and sensitivity for both groupswere evaluated according to United States public health services (USPHS) criteria. Results:Fracture resistance, marginal adaptation, retention, caries and sensitivitywere evaluated according to the criteria of USPHS and we found there is nosignificant difference as both groups scaled zero score. Conclusions:Both IPS Empress Cad and glazedCeltra Duo laminate veneers revealed high successful clinical performance in terms of fracture resistance, marginal adaptation, retention, and sensitivity
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.09.Ph.D.2020.Om.P (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110082987000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.09.Ph.D.2020.Om.P (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 82987.CD Not for loan 01020110082987000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics

Aim:To evaluate fracture resistance and survival rate of IPS Empress CAD versusglazedCeltra Duo ceramic laminate veneers.Methodology:Thirty-six ceramic laminate veneers were fabricated for maxillaryanterior teeth. The patients were divided into two groups according to the materialGroup 1(control group) fabricated from IPS Empress CAD laminate veneers and group2(intervention group) fabricated from glazedCeltra Duo laminate veneers.Standardized the same preparation with butt joint design and chamfer finish linelocated supra gingival were performed for all the teeth.The fabrication of the veneers was performed using Cad\Cam(Ceramill motion)machine, with software (Exocad). The veneers surfaces were treated and silanatedaccording to the manufacture instruction of each ceramic and enamel surfaces wereetched where total etch adhesive protocol was obeyed using BISCO.Fracture resistance, marginal adaptation, retention, and sensitivity for both groupswere evaluated according to United States public health services (USPHS) criteria. Results:Fracture resistance, marginal adaptation, retention, caries and sensitivitywere evaluated according to the criteria of USPHS and we found there is nosignificant difference as both groups scaled zero score. Conclusions:Both IPS Empress Cad and glazedCeltra Duo laminate veneers revealed high successful clinical performance in terms of fracture resistance, marginal adaptation, retention, and sensitivity

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.