header
Image from OpenLibrary

One-year clinical evaluation of IPS empress CAD versus polished celtra DUO ceramic laminate veneers : Randomized controlled clinical trial / Hayat Ibrahim Mahrous Ibrahim ; Supervised Mohammed Labib Zamzam , Jylan Fouad Elguindy , Ahmed Soliman Idris

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Hayat Ibrahim Mahrous Ibrahim , 2020Description: 120 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • تقويم اكلينيكى لمدة عام للوجوه التجميلية المصنعة من أى بى اس امبريس كاد مقارنة بالوجوه التجميلية المصنعة من سيلترا ديو الملمعة [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics Summary: Aim: To evaluate fracture resistance and survival rate of IPS Empress CAD versus Polished Celtra Duo ceramic laminate veneers.Methodology: Thirty-six ceramic laminate veneers were fabricated for maxillary anterior teeth. The patients were divided into two groups according to the material Group 1(control group) fabricated from IPS Empress CAD laminate veneers and group 2(intervention group) fabricated from Polished Celtra Duo laminate veneers. Standardized butt joint preparation design and chamfer finish line located supra gingival were performed for all the teeth. The fabrication of the veneers was performed using Cad\Cam (Ceramill motion) machine, with software (Exocad). The veneers surfaces were treated and silanated according to the manufacture instruction of each ceramic and enamel surfaces were etched where total etch adhesive protocol was obeyed using BISCO. Fracture resistance, marginal adaptation, retention, and sensitivity for both groups were evaluated according to United States public health services (USPHS) criteria Results: Fracture resistance, marginal adaptation, retention, caries and sensitivity were evaluated according to the criteria of USPHS and we found there is no significant difference as both groups scaled zero score. Conclusions: Both IPS Empress Cad and Polished Celtra Duo laminate veneers revealed high successful clinical performance in terms of fracture resistance, marginal adaptation, retention, and sensitivity
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.09.Ph.D.2020.Ha.O (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110082988000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.09.Ph.D.2020.Ha.O (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 82988.CD Not for loan 01020110082988000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics

Aim: To evaluate fracture resistance and survival rate of IPS Empress CAD versus Polished Celtra Duo ceramic laminate veneers.Methodology: Thirty-six ceramic laminate veneers were fabricated for maxillary anterior teeth. The patients were divided into two groups according to the material Group 1(control group) fabricated from IPS Empress CAD laminate veneers and group 2(intervention group) fabricated from Polished Celtra Duo laminate veneers. Standardized butt joint preparation design and chamfer finish line located supra gingival were performed for all the teeth. The fabrication of the veneers was performed using Cad\Cam (Ceramill motion) machine, with software (Exocad). The veneers surfaces were treated and silanated according to the manufacture instruction of each ceramic and enamel surfaces were etched where total etch adhesive protocol was obeyed using BISCO. Fracture resistance, marginal adaptation, retention, and sensitivity for both groups were evaluated according to United States public health services (USPHS) criteria Results: Fracture resistance, marginal adaptation, retention, caries and sensitivity were evaluated according to the criteria of USPHS and we found there is no significant difference as both groups scaled zero score. Conclusions: Both IPS Empress Cad and Polished Celtra Duo laminate veneers revealed high successful clinical performance in terms of fracture resistance, marginal adaptation, retention, and sensitivity

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.