header
Image from OpenLibrary

Accuracy of sopro-life camera in comparison with ICDAS II for detection of Initial caries in adult patients with non cavitated pits and fissure discoloration : Diagnostic accuracy study / Nora Ahmed Ali Alzayyat ; Supervised Randa Mohamed Hafez , Asmaa Ali Yassen , Shereen Hafez Ibrahim

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Nora Ahmed Ali Alzayyat , 2020Description: 139 P. : charts , facsmilies ; 25cmOther title:
  • دقة الكاميرا ذات الاشعاع الضوئى فى الكشف عن تسوس الأسنان الأولى مقارنة بالنظام الدولى للكشف عن تسوس الأسنان و ذلك فى شقوق الأسنان المتصبغه فى المرضى البالغين : دراسة اكلينيكية لدقة التشخيص [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Operative Dentistry Summary: This study was conducted to assess diagnostic accuracy of a light induced fluorescence intraoral camera versus those of the visual-tactile assessment method according to modified ICDAS-II criteria clinically. Occlusal surfaces of 260 molar and premolar teeth from 52 adult patients who fulfilled the eligibility criteria were examined by two examiners using two diagnostic methods. The teeth were firstly assessed visually according to the criteria of the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS-II) then by fluorescence camera. Inter observer agreement and intra observer agreement were measured for ICDAS- II and for the camera using Kappa test. Correlation between methods was calculated using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and effect size for comparison between the two modalities. The Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, diagnostic accuracy, likelihood ratios, Area Under the ROC curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the (AUC) for caries detection by Soprolife® were evalutaed. The results of the current study revealed a significant positive correlation between the ICDAS-II and the camera measurements. There was a statistically significant difference between scores of the two modalities (P-value <0.001, Effect size = 0.572). The sensitivity of Soprolife® was (94.2%), specificity (84.2%), positive predictive value (87.1%), negative predictive value (92.8%), positive likelihood ratio (6%), negative likelihood ratio (0.07%) and the diagnostic accuracy was (89.5%). Area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.909 with 95% Confidence Interval (0.863 {u2013} 0.955). For both ICDAs and Soprolife® regarding both observers; there was perfect intraobserver agreement (Kappa = 1.000) for both modalities and observers. Inter-observer agreement as regards ICDAs ; there was moderate inter-observer agreement (Kappa = 0.520). While for Soprolife®, there was substantial inter-observer agreement (Kappa =0.798).
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.03.Ph.D.2020.No.A (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110083131000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.03.Ph.D.2020.No.A (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 83131.CD Not for loan 01020110083131000
Browsing المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
Cai01.09.03.Ph.D.2020.Na.E Evaluation the efficacy of a herbal licorice on reducing salivary streptococcus mutans levels versus chlorohexidine mouth wash in high caries risk patients : A randomized clinical trial / Cai01.09.03.Ph.D.2020.Na.E Evaluation the efficacy of a herbal licorice on reducing salivary streptococcus mutans levels versus chlorohexidine mouth wash in high caries risk patients : A randomized clinical trial / Cai01.09.03.Ph.D.2020.No.A Accuracy of sopro-life camera in comparison with ICDAS II for detection of Initial caries in adult patients with non cavitated pits and fissure discoloration : Diagnostic accuracy study / Cai01.09.03.Ph.D.2020.No.A Accuracy of sopro-life camera in comparison with ICDAS II for detection of Initial caries in adult patients with non cavitated pits and fissure discoloration : Diagnostic accuracy study / Cai01.09.03.Ph.D.2020.Ra.E Effect of propolis and pomegranate extract mouthwashes on taste alteration, salivary pH and antibacterial activity in high caries risk patients : A randomized control trial / Cai01.09.03.Ph.D.2020.Ra.E Effect of propolis and pomegranate extract mouthwashes on taste alteration, salivary pH and antibacterial activity in high caries risk patients : A randomized control trial / Cai01.09.03.Ph.D.2020.Sh.C Clinical performance of direct fiber reinforced resin composite restorations versus direct microhybrid resin composite restorations in endodontically treated molars : A randomized clinical trial /

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Operative Dentistry

This study was conducted to assess diagnostic accuracy of a light induced fluorescence intraoral camera versus those of the visual-tactile assessment method according to modified ICDAS-II criteria clinically. Occlusal surfaces of 260 molar and premolar teeth from 52 adult patients who fulfilled the eligibility criteria were examined by two examiners using two diagnostic methods. The teeth were firstly assessed visually according to the criteria of the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS-II) then by fluorescence camera. Inter observer agreement and intra observer agreement were measured for ICDAS- II and for the camera using Kappa test. Correlation between methods was calculated using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and effect size for comparison between the two modalities. The Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, diagnostic accuracy, likelihood ratios, Area Under the ROC curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the (AUC) for caries detection by Soprolife® were evalutaed. The results of the current study revealed a significant positive correlation between the ICDAS-II and the camera measurements. There was a statistically significant difference between scores of the two modalities (P-value <0.001, Effect size = 0.572). The sensitivity of Soprolife® was (94.2%), specificity (84.2%), positive predictive value (87.1%), negative predictive value (92.8%), positive likelihood ratio (6%), negative likelihood ratio (0.07%) and the diagnostic accuracy was (89.5%). Area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.909 with 95% Confidence Interval (0.863 {u2013} 0.955). For both ICDAs and Soprolife® regarding both observers; there was perfect intraobserver agreement (Kappa = 1.000) for both modalities and observers. Inter-observer agreement as regards ICDAs ; there was moderate inter-observer agreement (Kappa = 0.520). While for Soprolife®, there was substantial inter-observer agreement (Kappa =0.798).

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.