header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Remineralization potential of innovative biomimetic material versus casein phosphopeptide- amorphous calcium phosphate in caries white spot lesions : A randomized clinical trial / Donia Mahmoud Abdelmoaty ; Supervised Mohamed Adel Ezzat , Shereen Hafez Ibrahim , Iman Aboauf

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Donia Mahmoud Abdelmoaty , 2020Description: 86 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • فاعلية المواد الحيوية المبتكرة فى اعادة التمعدن مقارنة بمادة الكازين فوسفوالببتيد - الكالسيوم فوسفات غير المتبلور في حالات الافات المبكرة للاسنان : دراسة سريرية عشوائيه [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Operative Dentistry Summary: Aim: The current study was conducted to compare between reminerlization potential of innovative biomimetic material versus casein-phosphopeptide/amorphous-calcium phosphate in caries white spot lesions. Methodology: in split mouth design, white spot lesions in anterior teeth of post orthodontic debanding patients received randomly two types of remineralizing agents, either clinpro tooth crème or MI paste plus, both materials were applied according to the manufacturer{u2019}s instructions. White spot lesions were evaluated at base line one month and after 3, 6 months follow up periods by two blinded assessors to assess patient satisfaction using VAS score and color change by Vita Easyhshade. Results: One-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Tukey{u2019}s test showed that within each remineralizing agent, there was no statistically significant difference in L* mean values between different evaluation time periods. Independent Student-t test showed that at each evaluation time, there was no statistically significant difference in L* mean values between both remineralizing agents.Two-way ANOVA showed that the two independent variables 2remineralizing agent3 (P<0.004) and 2evaluation time3 (P<0.0001) had asignificant effect on patient satisfaction. However, their interaction (P=0.916) showed no significant effect on patient satisfaction. T6 revealed the significantly highest VAS mean values; followed by T3; then T0 and T1 which were statistically similar but vii at each evaluation time, there was no statistically significant difference in VAS mean values between both reminerailizing agents
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.03.M.Sc.2020.Do.R (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110083851000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.03.M.Sc.2020.Do.R (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 83851.CD Not for loan 01020110083851000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Operative Dentistry

Aim: The current study was conducted to compare between reminerlization potential of innovative biomimetic material versus casein-phosphopeptide/amorphous-calcium phosphate in caries white spot lesions. Methodology: in split mouth design, white spot lesions in anterior teeth of post orthodontic debanding patients received randomly two types of remineralizing agents, either clinpro tooth crème or MI paste plus, both materials were applied according to the manufacturer{u2019}s instructions. White spot lesions were evaluated at base line one month and after 3, 6 months follow up periods by two blinded assessors to assess patient satisfaction using VAS score and color change by Vita Easyhshade. Results: One-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Tukey{u2019}s test showed that within each remineralizing agent, there was no statistically significant difference in L* mean values between different evaluation time periods. Independent Student-t test showed that at each evaluation time, there was no statistically significant difference in L* mean values between both remineralizing agents.Two-way ANOVA showed that the two independent variables 2remineralizing agent3 (P<0.004) and 2evaluation time3 (P<0.0001) had asignificant effect on patient satisfaction. However, their interaction (P=0.916) showed no significant effect on patient satisfaction. T6 revealed the significantly highest VAS mean values; followed by T3; then T0 and T1 which were statistically similar but vii at each evaluation time, there was no statistically significant difference in VAS mean values between both reminerailizing agents

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image