header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Impact of soft tissue manipulation versus traditional physiotherapy program on diaphragmatic excursion in asthmatic patients / Mostafa Mohamed Saad Shams Eldeen ; Supervised Hala Mohamed Ezz Eldeen , Mariam Elsayed Mohamed , Khaled Mahmoud Kamel

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Mostafa Mohamed Saad Shams Eldeen , 2021Description: 100 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • تاثير المعالجة الرخوية للانسجة مقابل العلاج الطبيعى للصدرعلى ازاحة الحجاب الحاجز فى مرضى حساسية الصدر [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Cardiopulmonary and Geriatrics Disorders Summary: Background and purpose: Asthma is an important worldwide health problem. Asthma carries major health risks with the most cause-specific mortalities being those of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases .Asthma may affect the respiratory function of children and adults.The aim of this study was to compare of soft tissue manipulation versus traditional physiotherapy program on diaphragmatic excursion in asthmatic patients. Subjects and methods: {u200E}Forty men and women participated in this study. Their age ranged from 20to 40 years old, suffered from mild asthma (FEV1 {u2265} 80 %). They were assigned into two equal groups:Group (A) consisted of 20 participants received soft tissue manipulation of upper cervical region (C0-1), upper dorsal region (T3-4) and thoracolumbar junction followed by muscle energy technique once weekly for three weeks .Group (B) consisted of 20 participants received traditional physiotherapy program (pursed lip breathing exercise, diaphragmatic breathing exercise) ten repetitions each exercise per session, three times a week for three weeks respectively . Results: There was significant improvement for group (A) and group (B) in FEV1 (4.10%{u2191}, 3.27 %{u2191}), PEF (22.85%{u2191}, 3.2 %{u2191}), diaphragmatic excursion (19.6%{u2191}, 4.5 %{u2191}) and maximum inspiratory pressure (14.58%{u2191}, 6.11 %{u2191}) for all participant in Group A and B respectively, but there was statistical significance in favor of group A
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.02.Ph.D.2021.Mo.I (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110084135000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.02.Ph.D.2021.Mo.I (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 84135.CD Not for loan 01020110084135000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Cardiopulmonary and Geriatrics Disorders

Background and purpose: Asthma is an important worldwide health problem. Asthma carries major health risks with the most cause-specific mortalities being those of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases .Asthma may affect the respiratory function of children and adults.The aim of this study was to compare of soft tissue manipulation versus traditional physiotherapy program on diaphragmatic excursion in asthmatic patients. Subjects and methods: {u200E}Forty men and women participated in this study. Their age ranged from 20to 40 years old, suffered from mild asthma (FEV1 {u2265} 80 %). They were assigned into two equal groups:Group (A) consisted of 20 participants received soft tissue manipulation of upper cervical region (C0-1), upper dorsal region (T3-4) and thoracolumbar junction followed by muscle energy technique once weekly for three weeks .Group (B) consisted of 20 participants received traditional physiotherapy program (pursed lip breathing exercise, diaphragmatic breathing exercise) ten repetitions each exercise per session, three times a week for three weeks respectively . Results: There was significant improvement for group (A) and group (B) in FEV1 (4.10%{u2191}, 3.27 %{u2191}), PEF (22.85%{u2191}, 3.2 %{u2191}), diaphragmatic excursion (19.6%{u2191}, 4.5 %{u2191}) and maximum inspiratory pressure (14.58%{u2191}, 6.11 %{u2191}) for all participant in Group A and B respectively, but there was statistical significance in favor of group A

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image