Management of miller class I & II gingival recession using conventional versus abrasive deepithelialization of palatal graft : A randomized controlled clinical trial / Halla Gamal Mohammed Esmail ; Supervised Azza Ezz Elarab , Weam Elbattawy
Material type: TextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Halla Gamal Mohammed Esmail , 2021Description: 178 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:- علاج الانحسار اللثوى ميلر الدرجة الأولى والثانية باستخدام نزع طلاء الطعم الحنكى التقليدى فى مقابل نزع طلاء الطعم الحنكى بالكشط : تجربة سريرية إكلينيكية عشوائية مضبوطة [Added title page title]
- Issued also as CD
Item type | Current library | Home library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thesis | قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.09.08.M.Sc.2021.Ha.M (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not for loan | 01010110084274000 | |||
CD - Rom | مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.09.08.M.Sc.2021.Ha.M (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 84274.CD | Not for loan | 01020110084274000 |
Browsing المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Periodontology
Aim: The aim of the present clinical study is to compare post-operative morbidity and root coverage outcomes in patients subjected to conventional de-epithelialized free gingival graft (DFGG) and abrasive DFGG for the treatment of gingival recession.Methodology: Twenty sites in 13 patients showing Miller I / II gingival recession were selected and divided into intervention group where coronally advanced flap (CAF) combined with abrasive DFGG were performed while in the control group, CAF combined with conventional DFGG were performed. All the selected patients were assessed for postoperative morbidity and root coverage outcomes.Results: No statistically significant differences were demonstrated between the two groups in patients{u2019}post-operative pain and analgesics consumption. Root coverage results did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups except for gingival phenotype and recession width after 6 months were in favor of conventional DFGG. It was found that the conventional DFGG group was 2.25 folds prone to CRC than the abrasive DFGG group
Issued also as CD
There are no comments on this title.